Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2 #131378

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2 #131378

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024
+1 −1

Conversation

ojeda
Copy link
Contributor

@ojeda ojeda commented Oct 7, 2024

r? @Kobzol

try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux

@ojeda
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2
5fb71c6 
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 7, 2024
@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

ojeda commented Oct 7, 2024

@bors try

@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

ojeda commented Oct 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@rustbot label A-rust-for-linux

@rustbot rustbot added the A-rust-for-linux Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project label Oct 7, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#131378 - ojeda:ci-rfl, r=<try>
92bbae3 
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2

r? `@Kobzol`

try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 5fb71c6 with merge 92bbae3...

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Oct 7, 2024

r=me when the try build completes successfully
@bors delegate+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

✌️ @ojeda, you can now approve this pull request!

If @lqd told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@lqd

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-rust-for-linux failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) 
file:.git/config remote.origin.url=https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust
file:.git/config remote.origin.fetch=+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
file:.git/config gc.auto=0
file:.git/config http.https://github.com/.extraheader=AUTHORIZATION: basic ***
file:.git/config branch.try.remote=origin
file:.git/config branch.try.merge=refs/heads/try
file:.git/config submodule.library/backtrace.url=https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs.git
file:.git/config submodule.library/stdarch.active=true
file:.git/config submodule.library/stdarch.url=https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch.git
file:.git/config submodule.src/doc/book.active=true

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 7, 2024
@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

ojeda commented Oct 7, 2024

Thanks Rémy!

Right, I used our repository, not mainline -- tag pushed, retrying.

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 5fb71c6 with merge d4d4de2...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#131378 - ojeda:ci-rfl, r=<try>
d4d4de2 
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2

r? `@Kobzol`

try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: d4d4de2 (d4d4de26c4b152b931a5e90a0a28e07f3116f129)

@ojeda ojeda mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Open
7 tasks
@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

ojeda commented Oct 7, 2024

@bors r=@lqd

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2024

📌 Commit 5fb71c6 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 7, 2024
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#131412 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-478o6h6, r=matth…
6f4ae0f 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#131378 (CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2)
 - rust-lang#131400 (Simplify the compiletest directives for ignoring coverage-test modes)
 - rust-lang#131408 (Remove unneeded argument of `LinkCollector::verify_disambiguator`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7e9da42 into rust-lang:master Oct 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Oct 8, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
@rust-timer
Unrolled build for rust-lang#131378
ec1aaea 
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131378 - ojeda:ci-rfl, r=lqd

CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.12-rc2

r? `@Kobzol`

try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@ojeda ojeda deleted the ci-rfl branch October 9, 2024 00:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Kobzol Kobzol

Labels
A-rust-for-linux Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.83.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@ojeda @bors @lqd @rust-log-analyzer @Kobzol @rustbot