-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #131069
Rollup of 5 pull requests #131069
Conversation
avoid `{type error}` being leaked in user-facing messages, particularly when using the `adt_const_params` feature
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Copy correct path to clipboard for modules/keywords/primitives Fixes rust-lang#131021
…ope-lint, r=jieyouxu Preserve brackets around if-lets and skip while-lets r? `@jieyouxu` Tracked by rust-lang#124085 Fresh out of rust-lang#129466, we have discovered 9 crates that the lint did not successfully migrate because the span of `if let` includes the surrounding brackets `(..)` like the following, which surprised me a bit. ```rust if (if let .. { .. } else { .. }) { // ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // the span somehow includes the surrounding brackets } ``` There is one crate that failed the migration because some suggestion spans cross the macro expansion boundaries. Surely there is no way to patch them with `match` rewrite. To handle this case, we will instead require all spans to be tested for admissibility as suggestion spans. Besides, there are 4 false negative cases discovered with desugared-`while let`. We don't need to lint them, because the `else` branch surely contains exactly one statement because the drop order is not changed whatsoever in this case. ```rust while let Some(value) = droppy().get() { .. } // is desugared into loop { if let Some(value) = droppy().get() { .. } else { break; // here can be nothing observable in this block } } ``` I believe this is the one and only false positive that I have found. I think we have finally nailed all the corner cases this time.
…8179, r=compiler-errors Fix `adt_const_params` leaking `{type error}` in error msg Fixes the confusing diagnostic described in rust-lang#118179. (users would see `{type error}` in some situations, which is pretty weird) `adt_const_params` tracking issue: rust-lang#95174
Improve `--print=check-cfg` documentation This PR improves the `--print=check-cfg` documentation by: 1. switching to a table for better readability 2. adding a clear indication where the specific check-cfg syntax starts 3. adding a link to the main `--check-cfg` documentation `@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
…int, r=Kobzol enable compiler fingerprint logs in verbose mode This provides very useful logs especially when debugging build cache-related stuff.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 63a0bdd562 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (fb4aebd): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary 4.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 768.228s -> 770.125s (0.25%) |
Successful merges:
adt_const_params
leaking{type error}
in error msg #131038 (Fixadt_const_params
leaking{type error}
in error msg)--print=check-cfg
documentation #131053 (Improve--print=check-cfg
documentation)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup