Revert "Add recursion limit to FFI safety lint" #130758
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 7160447.
|
r? @nnethercote rustbot has assigned @nnethercote. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
|
yolo @bors r=jieyouxu rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
…mit, r=jieyouxu Revert "Add recursion limit to FFI safety lint" It's not necessarily clear if warning when we hit the recursion limit is the right thing to do, first of all. **More importantly**, this PR was implemented incorrectly in the first place; it was not decrementing the recursion limit when stepping out of a type, so it would trigger when a ctype has more than RECURSION_LIMIT fields *anywhere* in the type's set of recursively reachable fields. Reverts rust-lang#130598 Reopens rust-lang#130310 Fixes rust-lang#130757
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129545 (rustdoc: redesign toolbar and disclosure widgets) - rust-lang#130618 (Skip query in get_parent_item when possible.) - rust-lang#130727 (Check vtable projections for validity in miri) - rust-lang#130739 (Pass bootstrap cargo when `--stage 0` and `COMPILETEST_FORCE_STAGE0`) - rust-lang#130750 (Add new Tier-3 target: `loongarch64-unknown-linux-ohos`) - rust-lang#130758 (Revert "Add recursion limit to FFI safety lint") - rust-lang#130759 (Update books) - rust-lang#130762 (stabilize const_intrinsic_copy) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129545 (rustdoc: redesign toolbar and disclosure widgets) - rust-lang#130618 (Skip query in get_parent_item when possible.) - rust-lang#130727 (Check vtable projections for validity in miri) - rust-lang#130750 (Add new Tier-3 target: `loongarch64-unknown-linux-ohos`) - rust-lang#130758 (Revert "Add recursion limit to FFI safety lint") - rust-lang#130759 (Update books) - rust-lang#130762 (stabilize const_intrinsic_copy) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130758 - compiler-errors:ctype-recursion-limit, r=jieyouxu Revert "Add recursion limit to FFI safety lint" It's not necessarily clear if warning when we hit the recursion limit is the right thing to do, first of all. **More importantly**, this PR was implemented incorrectly in the first place; it was not decrementing the recursion limit when stepping out of a type, so it would trigger when a ctype has more than RECURSION_LIMIT fields *anywhere* in the type's set of recursively reachable fields. Reverts rust-lang#130598 Reopens rust-lang#130310 Fixes rust-lang#130757
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's not necessarily clear if warning when we hit the recursion limit is the right thing to do, first of all.
More importantly, this PR was implemented incorrectly in the first place; it was not decrementing the recursion limit when stepping out of a type, so it would trigger when a ctype has more than RECURSION_LIMIT fields anywhere in the type's set of recursively reachable fields.
Reverts #130598
Reopens #130310
Fixes #130757