Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #130378

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lolbinarycat and others added 17 commits September 6, 2024 16:28
previously this would cause an infinite loop due to it being
unable to read `n` bytes.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
…=Amanieu

properly handle EOF in BufReader::peek

previously this would cause an infinite loop due to it being unable to read `n` bytes.
…kSimulacrum,workingjubilee

Add `NonNull` convenience methods to `Box` and `Vec`

Implements the ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#418.

The docs for the added methods are mostly copied from the existing methods that use raw pointers instead of `NonNull`.

I'm new to this "contributing to rustc" thing, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong. In particular, I don't know what the process is for creating a new unstable feature. Please advise me if I should do something. Thank you.
…r, r=Kobzol,Mark-Simulacrum

make dist vendoring configurable

Adds a new option `dist.vendor` which allows people to decide whether to vendor dependencies for their custom distribution tarball builds. Note that our builds will not be affected, as the default for this option is the same as the previous vendoring condition from bootstrap.
MaybeUninit::zeroed: mention that padding is not zeroed

That should clarify cases like [this](rust-lang#129778 (comment)).
Make some lint doctests compatible with `--stage=0`

Currently, running `x test compiler --stage=0` (with `rust.parallel-compiler=false` to avoid other problems) results in two failures, because these lint doctests aren't compatible with the current stage0 compiler.

In theory, the more “correct” solution would be to wrap the opening triple-backtick line in  `#[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), doc = "..."]`. However, that causes a few practical problems:
- `tidy` doesn't understand that syntax, and miscounts the number of backticks in the comment block.
- `lint-docs` doesn't understand that syntax, and thinks it's trying to declare the lint name.
- Working around the above problems would cause more work and more confusion for whoever does the next bootstrap beta bump.

So instead this PR adds some bootstrap gates inside the individual doctests, which end up producing the desired behaviour, and are straightforward to remove.
unstable-book: `trait_upcasting` example should not have `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`

Tracking issue: rust-lang#65991

`trait_upcasting` is not currently an incomplete feature; therefore examples of its use do not require `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 15, 2024
@Zalathar Zalathar closed this Sep 15, 2024
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the rollup-gslrahk branch September 15, 2024 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants