Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #129801

Closed
wants to merge 205 commits into from

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

alibektas and others added 30 commits August 1, 2024 02:38
Add an explanatory sentence and some sample code to help
readers understand why this struct exists.
minor: Add a doc comment for OpQueue

Add an explanatory sentence and some sample code to help readers understand why this struct exists.
…ebold

internal: Be more resilient to bad language item definitions in binop inference

Fixes rust-lang#16287
Fixes rust-lang#16286

There's one more in `write_fn_trait_method_resolution`, but I'm not sure if it won't cause further problems in `infer_closures`.
fix: Panic while canonicalizing erroneous projection type

Fixes rust-lang#17866

The root cause of rust-lang#17866 is quite horrifyng 😨

```rust
trait T {
    type A;
}

type Foo = <S as T>::A; // note that S isn't defined

fn main() {
    Foo {}
}
```

While inferencing alias type `Foo = <S as T>::A`;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/78c2bdce860dbd996a8083224d01a96660dd6a15/crates/hir-ty/src/infer.rs#L1388-L1398

the error type `S` in it is substituted by inference var in L1396 above as below;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/78c2bdce860dbd996a8083224d01a96660dd6a15/crates/hir-ty/src/infer/unify.rs#L866-L869

This new inference var's index is `1`, as the type inferecing procedure here previously inserted another inference var into same `InferenceTable`.

But after that, the projection type made from the above then passed to the following function;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/78c2bdce860dbd996a8083224d01a96660dd6a15/crates/hir-ty/src/traits.rs#L88-L96

here, a whole new `InferenceTable` is made, without any inference var and in the L94, this table calls;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/78c2bdce860dbd996a8083224d01a96660dd6a15/crates/hir-ty/src/infer/unify.rs#L364-L370

And while registering `AliasEq` `obligation`, this obligation contains inference var `?1` made from the previous table, but this table has only one inference var `?0` made at L365.
So, the chalk panics when we try to canonicalize that obligation to register it, because the obligation contains an inference var `?1` that the canonicalizing table doesn't have.

Currently, we are calling `InferenceTable::new()` to do some normalizing, unifying or coercing things to some targets that might contain inference var that the new table doesn't have.
I think that this is quite dangerous footgun because the inference var is just an index that does not contain the information which table does it made from, so sometimes this "foreign" index might cause panic like this case, or point at the wrong variable.

This PR mitigates such behaviour simply by inserting sufficient number of inference vars to new table to avoid such problem.
This strategy doesn't harm current r-a's intention because the inference vars that passed into new tables are just "unresolved" variables in current r-a, so this is just making sure that such "unresolved" variables exist in the new table
fix: Panic while hovering associated function with type annotation on generic param that not inherited from its container type

Fixes rust-lang#17871

We call `generic_args_sans_defaults` here;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/64a140527b383e3a2fe95908881624fc5374c60c/crates/hir-ty/src/display.rs#L1021-L1034

but the following substitution inside that function panic in rust-lang#17871;

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/64a140527b383e3a2fe95908881624fc5374c60c/crates/hir-ty/src/display.rs#L1468

it's because the `Binders.binder` inside `default_parameters` has a same length with the generics of the function we are hovering on, but the generics of it is split into two, `fn_params` and `parent_params`.
Because of this, it may panic if the function has one or more default parameters and both `fn_params` and `parent_params` are non-empty, like the case in the title of this PR.

So, we must call `generic_args_sans_default` first and then split it into `fn_params` and `parent_params`
…kril

internal: Properly check the edition for edition dependent syntax kinds

This puts the current edition in a bunch of places, most of which I annoted with FIXMEs asside from the ones in ide-assists because I couldnt bother with those
Assuming it isn't cancelled. Closes rust-lang#17902.

The only place CommandHandle::join is used is when the flycheck command
finishes, so this commit changes the behavior of the method itself.
…zyCell/Lock

This doesn't get rid of the once_cell dependency, unfortunately, since we have dependencies that use it, but it's a nice to do cleanup. And when our deps will eventually get rid of once_cell we will get rid of it for free.
This speeds up short identifiers search significantly, while unlikely to have an effect on long identifiers (the analysis takes much longer than some character comparison).

Tested by finding all references to `eq()` (from `PartialEq`) in the rust-analyzer repo. Total time went down from 100s to 10s (a 10x reduction!).
internal: Replace once_cell with std's recently stabilized OnceCell/Lock and LazyCell/Lock

This doesn't get rid of the once_cell dependency, unfortunately, since we have dependencies that use it, but it's a nice to do cleanup. And when our deps will eventually get rid of once_cell we will get rid of it for free.
…s, r=Veykril

Test for word boundary in `FindUsages`

This speeds up short identifiers search significantly, while unlikely to have an effect on long identifiers (the analysis takes much longer than some character comparison).

Tested by finding all references to `eq()` (from `PartialEq`) in the rust-analyzer repo. Total time went down from 100s to 10s (a 10x reduction!).

Feel free to close this if you consider this a non-issue, as most short identifiers are local.
Allow flycheck process to exit gracefully

Assuming it isn't cancelled. Closes rust-lang#17902.

The only place CommandHandle::join() is used is when the flycheck command
finishes, so this commit changes the behavior of the method itself.

The only reason I can see for the existing behavior is if the command is somehow holding onto a build lock longer than it should, this would force it to be released. But it would be a pretty heavy-handed way to solve that issue. I'm not aware of this occurring in practice.
This PR touches a lot of parts. But the main changes are changing
`hir_expand::Name` to be raw edition-dependently and only when necessary
(unrelated to how the user originally wrote the identifier),
and changing `is_keyword()` and `is_raw_identifier()` to be edition-aware
(this was done in rust-lang#17896, but the FIXMEs were fixed here).

It is possible that I missed some cases, but most IDE parts should properly
escape (or not escape) identifiers now.

The rules of thumb are:

 - If we show the identifier to the user, its rawness should be determined
   by the edition of the edited crate. This is nice for IDE features,
   but really important for changes we insert to the source code.
 - For tests, I chose `Edition::CURRENT` (so we only have to (maybe) update
   tests when an edition becomes stable, to avoid churn).
 - For debugging tools (helper methods and logs), I used `Edition::LATEST`.
…-keyword, r=Veykril

fix: Properly account for editions in names

This PR touches a lot of parts. But the main changes are changing `hir_expand::Name` to be raw edition-dependently and only when necessary (unrelated to how the user originally wrote the identifier), and changing `is_keyword()` and `is_raw_identifier()` to be edition-aware (this was done in rust-lang#17896, but the FIXMEs were fixed here).

It is possible that I missed some cases, but most IDE parts should properly escape (or not escape) identifiers now.

The rules of thumb are:

 - If we show the identifier to the user, its rawness should be determined by the edition of the edited crate. This is nice for IDE features, but really important for changes we insert to the source code.
 - For tests, I chose `Edition::CURRENT` (so we only have to (maybe) update tests when an edition becomes stable, to avoid churn).
 - For debugging tools (helper methods and logs), I used `Edition::LATEST`.

Reviewing notes:

This is a really big PR but most of it is mechanical translation. I changed `Name` displayers to require an edition, and followed the compiler errors. Most methods just propagate the edition requirement. The interesting cases are mostly in `ide-assists`, as sometimes the correct crate to fetch the edition from requires awareness (there may be two). `ide-completions` and `ide-diagnostics` were solved pretty easily by introducing an edition field to their context. `ide` contains many features, for most of them it was propagated to the top level function and there the edition was fetched based on the file.

I also fixed all FIXMEs from rust-lang#17896. Some required introducing an edition parameter (usually not for many methods after the changes to `Name`), some were changed to a new method `is_any_identifier()` because they really want any possible keyword.

Fixes rust-lang#17895.
Fixes rust-lang#17774.
…r=davidbarsky

Add scip/lsif flag to exclude vendored libaries

rust-lang#17809 changed StaticIndex to include vendored libraries. This PR adds a flag to disable that behavior.

At work, our monorepo has too many rust targets to index all at once, so we split them up into several shards. Since all of our libraries are vendored, if rust-analyzer includes them, sharding no longer has much benefit, because every shard will have to index the entire transitive dependency graphs of all of its targets. We get around the issue presented in rust-lang#17809 because some other shard will index the libraries directly.
…, r=lnicola

Remove rust-analyzer.workspace.discoverProjectRunner

The functionality for this vscode config option was removed in rust-lang#17395, so it doesn't do anything anymore.
Pin `rowan` to `0.15.15`

To prevent rust-lang#17914, I think that it would be safer pinning this before we fix it correctly
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 31, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

📌 Commit 296e85f has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=30

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

workingjubilee commented Aug 31, 2024

Allowing these to try to preempt the beta bump on the hypothesis that these are already-tested code that may be fixing some regression somewhere. Indeed, Veykril is already concerned about a backport.

It's not the end of the world if they don't go through, though, so there's not really much worry if they don't before the beta bump has landed.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed-

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 296e85f with merge 2908a51...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129642 (Bump backtrace to 0.3.74~ish)
 - rust-lang#129733 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
 - rust-lang#129785 (Miri subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job aarch64-apple failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[7/123] Building CXX object lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_fuchsia.cpp.o
[8/123] Building CXX object lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flag_parser.cpp.o
[9/123] Building CXX object lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flags.cpp.o
FAILED: lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flags.cpp.o 
/Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang++ -DHAVE_RPC_XDR_H=0 -I/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/.. -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fPIC --target=arm64-apple-darwin -isysroot /Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk  -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -arch arm64 -arch x86_64 -arch x86_64h -isysroot /Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk -stdlib=libc++ -mmacosx-version-min=11 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk -fPIC -fno-builtin -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-stack-protector -fno-sanitize=safe-stack -fvisibility=hidden -fno-lto -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta -O3 -g -Wno-gnu -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-c99-extensions -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern -nostdinc++ -Wno-format -fno-rtti -Wframe-larger-than=570 -Wglobal-constructors -MD -MT lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flags.cpp.o -MF lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flags.cpp.o.d -o lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_flags.cpp.o -c /Users/runner/work/rust/rust/src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_flags.cpp
clang: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap: 6
clang: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation)
Apple clang version 14.0.3 (clang-1403.0.22.14.1)
Target: x86_64h-apple-darwin
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
clang: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s) - cannot generate preprocessed source with multiple -arch options.
[11/123] Building CXX object lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.osx.dir/sanitizer_libc.cpp.o
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
thread 'main' panicked at /Users/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/cmake-0.1.48/src/lib.rs:975:5:

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 31, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

...can that replicate?
@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 296e85f with merge 242be2e...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129642 (Bump backtrace to 0.3.74~ish)
 - rust-lang#129733 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
 - rust-lang#129785 (Miri subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

workingjubilee commented Aug 31, 2024

...okay, that did not replicate. I mean, the build may still fail for some reason but the sanitizers did build...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 4.455
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Sat, Aug 31, 2024  8:46:30 AM
  network time: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 08:46:30 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 31, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 31, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

Eh, c'est la vie~

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

partially merged already in #129809

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.