Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: revert spacing change in item-table #128051

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@notriddle notriddle commented Jul 22, 2024

It really wasn't necessary for the bug fix, and could reasonably be considered a functional regression.

In response to #127418 (comment)

It really wasn't necessary for the bug fix,
and could reasonably be considered a functional regression.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 22, 2024

r? @GuillaumeGomez

rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 22, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 22, 2024

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @jsha

@notriddle notriddle added T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. and removed T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 22, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

imo it made it easier to know which short doc's item we were reading. r=me if you think it's unnecessary.

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 22, 2024

📌 Commit cd0fd63 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 22, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117932 (Correct rustdoc section where we talk about rustdoc emitting errors on invalid code)
 - rust-lang#125990 (Rename `deprecated_safe` lint to `deprecated_safe_2024`)
 - rust-lang#127506 (rustc_target: add known safe s390x target features)
 - rust-lang#127820 (Rewrite and rename `issue-14698`. `issue-33329` and `issue-107094` `run-make` tests to rmake or ui)
 - rust-lang#127923 (Use reuse tool 4.0)
 - rust-lang#128008 (Start using `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` in the standard library)
 - rust-lang#128036 (add more tests)
 - rust-lang#128051 (rustdoc: revert spacing change in item-table)
 - rust-lang#128059 (Add regression test for items list size (rust-lang#128023))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 27ac108 into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128051 - notriddle:notriddle/spacing, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: revert spacing change in item-table

It really wasn't necessary for the bug fix, and could reasonably be considered a functional regression.

In response to rust-lang#127418 (comment)
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/spacing branch July 22, 2024 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants