-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments #126230
Conversation
This reverts commit faac70b.
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
The list of allowed third-party dependencies may have been modified! You must ensure that any new dependencies have compatible licenses before merging. These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
8cebd4e
to
fb2a528
Compare
The list of allowed third-party dependencies may have been modified! You must ensure that any new dependencies have compatible licenses before merging. These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
src/tools/tidy/src/extdeps.rs
Outdated
// Skip if it's a submodule, not initialized, and not in a CI environment. | ||
// | ||
// This prevents enforcing developers to fetch submodules for tidy. | ||
if is_submodule && !root.join(workspace).join(".git").exists() && !CiEnv::is_ci() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This won't work in tarball sources, will change it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed it to check if the directory is empty or not. For non-tarball sources, it's not possible to have an initialized submodule as an empty directory (because .git will be present). Even if it's a tarball source, we don't have any tool that is a submodule but an empty directory anyway. We can do this check this by using git
, but it makes things overly complicated and it wouldn't work on tarball sources.
fb2a528
to
91e1ef1
Compare
src/tools/tidy/src/deps.rs
Outdated
//("src/etc/test-float-parse", &[], None), // FIXME uncomment once all deps are vendored | ||
("src/tools/cargo", EXCEPTIONS_CARGO, None), | ||
("src/tools/cargo", EXCEPTIONS_CARGO, None, false), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not quite clear why this is false
. src/tools/cargo
is a submodule.
Overall I'm confused by this PR. tidy has depended on submodules existing for some time. From my understanding, things like the cargo submodule implicitly work via this check which ensures a subset of submodules are available.
Why not just leave #126225 (or some variation of that), and always check rustc-perf? Is there some significant downside of cloning rustc-perf?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lqd It seemed like you didn't like that we would force contributors to download rustc-perf. Do you have any specific concerns? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall I'm confused by this PR. tidy has depended on submodules existing for some time. From my understanding, things like the cargo submodule implicitly work via this check which ensures a subset of submodules are available.
Fetching a dist specific tool and continuously checking its license with tidy on development doesn't seem like a good idea overall, at least in my opinion (I am pretty sure some of the active contributors like @RalfJung don't like this kind of approach either).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not quite clear why this is false. src/tools/cargo is a submodule.
Added automatic submodule detection to prevent issues like this in the future.
cc @Kobzol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think ideally we'd require as few submodules as possible to be checked out. Submodules are annoying as updating them is always a separate step -- even if x.py does it automatically (which currently fails badly for me), the checkout is in a somewhat degraded state until the next x.py invocation.
If we can get that number down to 0, that would be perfect. :) But currently that's probably not yet possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's fine if there is a significant burden. Would it be possible to update the PR description to explain what the PR changes and the motivation for the change? That way, we're at least clear as to why it is changing (such as "avoids a significant download not relevant to most contributors", or whatever the actual reason is).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the PR description.
7e55123
to
af35904
Compare
src/tools/tidy/src/deps.rs
Outdated
@@ -515,6 +517,19 @@ pub fn check(root: &Path, cargo: &Path, bad: &mut bool) { | |||
let mut checked_runtime_licenses = false; | |||
|
|||
for &(workspace, exceptions, permitted_deps) in WORKSPACES { | |||
let gitmodules = root.join(".gitmodules"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we move this into the function? It seems like the function could take the directory rather than the file path, which simplifies it and avoids duplicating the exact filename everywhere.
src/tools/tidy/src/extdeps.rs
Outdated
@@ -14,6 +15,19 @@ const ALLOWED_SOURCES: &[&str] = &[ | |||
/// workspace `Cargo.toml`. | |||
pub fn check(root: &Path, bad: &mut bool) { | |||
for &(workspace, _, _) in crate::deps::WORKSPACES { | |||
let gitmodules = root.join(".gitmodules"); | |||
let submodules = build_helper::util::parse_gitmodules(&gitmodules); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we move this out of the loop? No need to re-parse for every workspace.
Same with the other call site in deps.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
af35904
to
e9e3c38
Compare
Applied the review notes above. @rustbot ready |
@bors r+ |
…-Simulacrum tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments Right now tidy requires rustc-perf to be fetched as it checks its license, but this doesn't make sense for most contributors since rustc-perf is a dist-specific tool and its license will not change frequently, especially during compiler development. This PR makes tidy to skip rustc-perf if it's not fetched and if it's not running in CI. Applies rust-lang#126225 (comment) and reverts rust-lang#126225.
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126230 (tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments) - rust-lang#126523 (std: refactor the TLS implementation) - rust-lang#126612 (Update outdated README in build-manifest.) - rust-lang#126616 (less bootstrap warnings) - rust-lang#126663 (remove `GIT_DIR` handling in pre-push hook) - rust-lang#126830 (make unsized_fn_params an internal feature) - rust-lang#126833 (don't ICE when encountering an extern type field during validation) - rust-lang#126837 (delegation: Do not crash on qpaths without a trait) - rust-lang#126851 (Rework pattern and expression nonterminal kinds.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…-Simulacrum tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments Right now tidy requires rustc-perf to be fetched as it checks its license, but this doesn't make sense for most contributors since rustc-perf is a dist-specific tool and its license will not change frequently, especially during compiler development. This PR makes tidy to skip rustc-perf if it's not fetched and if it's not running in CI. Applies rust-lang#126225 (comment) and reverts rust-lang#126225.
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126230 (tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments) - rust-lang#126608 (Add more constants, functions, and tests for `f16` and `f128`) - rust-lang#126612 (Update outdated README in build-manifest.) - rust-lang#126616 (less bootstrap warnings) - rust-lang#126663 (remove `GIT_DIR` handling in pre-push hook) - rust-lang#126830 (make unsized_fn_params an internal feature) - rust-lang#126833 (don't ICE when encountering an extern type field during validation) - rust-lang#126837 (delegation: Do not crash on qpaths without a trait) - rust-lang#126851 (Rework pattern and expression nonterminal kinds.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126230 (tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments) - rust-lang#126612 (Update outdated README in build-manifest.) - rust-lang#126616 (less bootstrap warnings) - rust-lang#126663 (remove `GIT_DIR` handling in pre-push hook) - rust-lang#126830 (make unsized_fn_params an internal feature) - rust-lang#126833 (don't ICE when encountering an extern type field during validation) - rust-lang#126837 (delegation: Do not crash on qpaths without a trait) - rust-lang#126851 (Rework pattern and expression nonterminal kinds.) - rust-lang#126862 (Add needs-symlink directive to compiletest) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126230 - onur-ozkan:followup-126225, r=Mark-Simulacrum tidy: skip submodules if not present for non-CI environments Right now tidy requires rustc-perf to be fetched as it checks its license, but this doesn't make sense for most contributors since rustc-perf is a dist-specific tool and its license will not change frequently, especially during compiler development. This PR makes tidy to skip rustc-perf if it's not fetched and if it's not running in CI. Applies rust-lang#126225 (comment) and reverts rust-lang#126225.
Right now tidy requires rustc-perf to be fetched as it checks its license, but this doesn't make sense for most contributors since rustc-perf is a dist-specific tool and its license will not change frequently, especially during compiler development. This PR makes tidy to skip rustc-perf if it's not fetched and if it's not running in CI.
Applies #126225 (comment) and reverts #126225.