Don't even parse an intrinsic unless the feature gate is enabled #123603
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
no-intrinsic
branch
from
1fa20dc
to
651d02a
Compare
estebank
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2024
|
I'll add it if not |
|
We already have tests for this, e.g. @bors r=estebank rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123016 (Remove `TypeVariableOriginKind` and `ConstVariableOriginKind`) - rust-lang#123462 (Cleanup: Rename `ModSep` to `PathSep`) - rust-lang#123603 (Don't even parse an intrinsic unless the feature gate is enabled) - rust-lang#123926 (Fix pretty HIR for anon consts in diagnostics) - rust-lang#123973 (crashes: readme: add reminder to add Fixes #abcde to prs to automatically close issues.) - rust-lang#123984 (sanitizers: Add rustc_sanitizers to triagebot.toml) - rust-lang#123989 (Just use `type_dependent_def_id` to figure out what the method is for an expr) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123603 - compiler-errors:no-intrinsic, r=estebank Don't even parse an intrinsic unless the feature gate is enabled Don't return true in `tcx.is_intrinsic` if the function is defined locally and `#![feature(intrinsics)]` is not enabled. This is a slightly more general fix than rust-lang#123526, since rust-lang#123587 shows that we have simplifying assumptions about intrinsics elsewhere in the compiler. This will make the code ICE again if the user **enables** `#[feature(intrinsics)]`, but I kind of feel like if we want to fix that, we should make the `INTERNAL_FEATURES` lint `Deny` again. Perhaps we could do that on non-nightly compilers. Or we should just stop compilation altogether if they have `#![feature]` enabled on a non-nightly compiler. As for the UX of *real* cases of hitting these ICEs, I believe pretty strongly that if a compiler/stdlib dev is modifying internal intrinsics (intentionally, like when making a change to rustc) we have no guarantee to make the ICE better looking for them. Honestly, *not* spitting out a stack trace is probably a disservice to the people who hit those ICEs in that case. r? `@Nilstrieb` `@estebank`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Don't return true in
tcx.is_intrinsicif the function is defined locally and#![feature(intrinsics)]is not enabled. This is a slightly more general fix than #123526, since #123587 shows that we have simplifying assumptions about intrinsics elsewhere in the compiler.This will make the code ICE again if the user enables
#[feature(intrinsics)], but I kind of feel like if we want to fix that, we should make theINTERNAL_FEATURESlintDenyagain. Perhaps we could do that on non-nightly compilers. Or we should just stop compilation altogether if they have#![feature]enabled on a non-nightly compiler.As for the UX of real cases of hitting these ICEs, I believe pretty strongly that if a compiler/stdlib dev is modifying internal intrinsics (intentionally, like when making a change to rustc) we have no guarantee to make the ICE better looking for them. Honestly, not spitting out a stack trace is probably a disservice to the people who hit those ICEs in that case.
r? @Nilstrieb @estebank