-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #120163
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #120163
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end.
Some of these tests use non-standard formatting that we can simulate by strategically adding `//` line comments. One contains `where` clauses that would be split across multiple lines, which we can keep on one line by moving the bounds to the generic type instead.
These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
Co-authored-by: fee1-dead <ent3rm4n@gmail.com>
…e impl is implemented on a type alias
Make traits / trait methods detected by the dead code lint Fixes rust-lang#118139 and rust-lang#41883
…n-ty-alias, r=notriddle Fix impl stripped in rustdoc HTML whereas it should not be in case the impl is implemented on a type alias Fixes rust-lang#119015. I talked about it a bit with ``@petrochenkov.`` They might change what `EffectiveVisibilities` return for impl items like this one and make them not only reachable but also re-exported, which would fix this case. It could also potentially break other things, so it'll be done whenever they can and then we can check together. Surprisingly, this fix is making rustdoc even closer to rustc in term of errors (the CI currently fails because currently accepted broken codes aren't working anymore with this change). Not sure exactly why though. This is linked to rust-lang#110631 from what I could find. So either I'm missing something here, or we consider it's ok and we consider the failing tests as "should fail" and I'll update `rustdoc-ui` ones. r? ``@notriddle``
Ensure `callee_id`s are body owners This PR makes the `callee_id` argument of Clippy's `implements_trait_with_env` optional, and when it is passed, ensures it is a body owner. rust-lang#118661 added the `callee_id` parameter to alleviate an ICE. Specifically, the `callee_id` is used to determine an "effect arg" in certain situations. Frankly, I [do not completely understand](rust-lang#118661 (comment)) what an "effect arg" is. But the code that determines it seems to require that `callee_id` is a body owner: - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1ead4761e9e2f056385768614c23ffa7acb6a19e/src/tools/clippy/clippy_utils/src/ty.rs#L286-L288 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1ead4761e9e2f056385768614c23ffa7acb6a19e/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/util.rs#L834 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1ead4761e9e2f056385768614c23ffa7acb6a19e/compiler/rustc_middle/src/hir/map/mod.rs#L372 In the current head, some def ids passed as `callee_id`s are not body owners. This PR fixes that. cc `@rust-lang/clippy` r? `@fee1-dead`
coverage: Format all coverage tests with `rustfmt` As suggested by <rust-lang#119984 (comment)>. Test files in `tests/` are normally ignored by `x fmt`, but sometimes those files end up being run through `rustfmt` anyway, either by `rust-analyzer` or by hand. When that happens, it's annoying to have to manually revert formatting changes that are unrelated to the actual changes being made. So it's helpful for the tests in the repository to already have standard formatting beforehand. However, there are several coverage tests that deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that line counts reveal more information about where code regions begin and end. In those cases, we can use `#[rustfmt::skip]` to prevent that code from being disturbed. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
…ilstrieb Remove special handling of `box` expressions from parser rust-lang#108471 added a temporary hack to parse `box expr`. It's been almost a year since then, so I think it's safe to remove the special handling. As a drive-by cleanup, move `parser/removed-syntax*` tests to their own directory.
…albertlarsan68 Increase vscode settings.json `git.detectSubmodulesLimit` The default vscode git integration throws a warning on the rust repository because it has more than the default limit of 10 submodules. This adds an increase to 20 to the settings.json that x.py offers to install on setup. <img width="461" alt="Screen Shot 2024-01-19 at 11 47 47 PM" src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/230691/440dfa4e-32e3-41f7-b8c6-5a07ade7aa14"> Also reported at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60917209/disable-vs-code-warning-submodules-which-wont-be-opened-automatically
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jan 20, 2024
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 20, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118257 (Make traits / trait methods detected by the dead code lint) - rust-lang#119997 (Fix impl stripped in rustdoc HTML whereas it should not be in case the impl is implemented on a type alias) - rust-lang#120000 (Ensure `callee_id`s are body owners) - rust-lang#120015 (coverage: Format all coverage tests with `rustfmt`) - rust-lang#120063 (Remove special handling of `box` expressions from parser) - rust-lang#120138 (Increase vscode settings.json `git.detectSubmodulesLimit`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 20, 2024
It's because of #118257 which detected new bugs. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
callee_id
s are body owners #120000 (Ensurecallee_id
s are body owners)rustfmt
#120015 (coverage: Format all coverage tests withrustfmt
)box
expressions from parser #120063 (Remove special handling ofbox
expressions from parser)git.detectSubmodulesLimit
#120138 (Increase vscode settings.jsongit.detectSubmodulesLimit
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup