Move i586-unknown-netbsd from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table
#119588
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
* Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table
That's fine, it wasn't my intention to push for tier 2 for this
one.
|
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…trieb Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2. Based on inspecting the PR adding it the table rust-lang#117170 and the fact that it is not built in CI which is one of the tier 2 requirements. cc `@he32` r? `@Nilstrieb`
This was referenced Jan 5, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…trieb Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2. Based on inspecting the PR adding it the table rust-lang#117170 and the fact that it is not built in CI which is one of the tier 2 requirements. cc ``@he32`` r? ``@Nilstrieb``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117556 (Disallow reference to `static mut` and adding `static_mut_ref` lint) - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues) - rust-lang#119420 (Handle ForeignItem as TAIT scope.) - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`) - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`) - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.) - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint) - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature) - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…trieb Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2. Based on inspecting the PR adding it the table rust-lang#117170 and the fact that it is not built in CI which is one of the tier 2 requirements. cc ```@he32``` r? ```@Nilstrieb```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues) - rust-lang#119414 (bootstrap: Move -Clto= setting from Rustc::run to rustc_cargo) - rust-lang#119420 (Handle ForeignItem as TAIT scope.) - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`) - rust-lang#119538 (Cleanup error handlers: round 5) - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`) - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.) - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint) - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature) - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119034 (Allow coverage tests to ignore test modes, and to enable color in coverage reports) - rust-lang#119148 (Tweak suggestions for bare trait used as a type) - rust-lang#119538 (Cleanup error handlers: round 5) - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`) - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.) - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint) - rust-lang#119583 (Make `intrinsics::assume` const stable) - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature) - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table) - rust-lang#119601 (`Emitter` cleanups) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119588 - Nemo157:i586-netbsd-tier-3, r=Nilstrieb Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2. Based on inspecting the PR adding it the table rust-lang#117170 and the fact that it is not built in CI which is one of the tier 2 requirements. cc ````@he32```` r? ````@Nilstrieb````
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It appears it was intended to be tier 3, but was accidentally added to tier 2. Based on inspecting the PR adding it the table #117170 and the fact that it is not built in CI which is one of the tier 2 requirements.
cc @he32
r? @Nilstrieb