Rollup of 5 pull requests #118473
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #118473
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This restriction made sense back when spaces separated function parameters, but now that they separate path components, there's no real ambiguity any more. Additionally, the Rust language allows it.
This is already covered by the normal unexpected char path.
This way, most of the parsing code doesn't need to be designed to handle it, since they should always be treated exactly the same anyhow.
When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle
the case when no fields were passed.
```
error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
--> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5
|
LL | foo::Foo {};
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided
```
There's no such thing as a big section header, so I don't know why the name was used.
If the TargetMachine is disposed after the Context is disposed, it can lead to use after frees in some cases. I've observed this happening occasionally on code compiled for aarch64-pc-windows-msvc using `-Zstack-protector=strong` but other users have reported AVs from host aarch64-pc-windows-msvc compilers as well.
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
…aumeGomez,jsha rustdoc-search: allow spaces around `::` in path query This restriction made sense back when spaces separated function parameters, but now that they separate path components, there's no real ambiguity any more. Additionally, the Rust language allows it. The other two commits are misc code cleanup.
…rrors
Tweak message on ADT with private fields building
When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle the case when no fields were passed.
```
error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
--> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5
|
LL | foo::Foo {};
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided
```
…ffleLapkin rustc_span: Remove unused symbols. As noted here, there is no guarantee that all pre-interned symbols are used. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b10cfcd65fd7f7b1ab9beb34798b2108de003452/compiler/rustc_span/src/symbol.rs#L124-L125 This was done starting with using ripgrep to search for `sym::whatever`. I removed anything that didn't show up. However this had a huge number of false positives, due to extensive macro use. Then there was a manual phase of adding back all the ones used my macros. I don't think this was worth my time to do, but it's done now . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
…header, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: remove small from `small-section-header` There's no such thing as a big section header, so I don't know why the name was used.
…r=Nilstrieb Dispose llvm::TargetMachines prior to llvm::Context being disposed If the TargetMachine is disposed after the Context is disposed, it can lead to use after frees in some cases. I've observed this happening occasionally on code compiled for aarch64-pc-windows-msvc using `-Zstack-protector=strong` but other users have reported AVs from host aarch64-pc-windows-msvc compilers as well. I was not able to extract a self-contained test case yet so there is no accompanying test. Fixes rust-lang#118462
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: c52b8763bf In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (1670ff6): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 672.84s -> 671.792s (-0.16%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
::in path query #118452 (rustdoc-search: allow spaces around::in path query)small-section-header#118458 (rustdoc: remove small fromsmall-section-header)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup