Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

effects: Run enforce_context_effects for all method calls #118282

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

So that we also perform checks when overloaded PartialEqs are called.

r? @compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 25, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 25, 2023

Some changes might have occurred in exhaustiveness checking

cc @Nadrieril

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments just to make sure I have the right understanding...

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/_impl.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<bool, ()> {
}

#[lang = "eq"]
#[const_trait]
// FIXME #[const_trait]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What breaks here, out of curiosity? from_str should be host = true, so why can't we evaluate the PartialEq obligation in the match above?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the only explanation here for this breaking is that we begun checking == method calls. Having this led to ICEs about mismatched number of generic arguments for PartialEq.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 27, 2023

📌 Commit dd3437b has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 27, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
…compiler-errors

effects: Run `enforce_context_effects` for all method calls

So that we also perform checks when overloaded `PartialEq`s are called.

r? `@compiler-errors`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111133 (Detect Python-like slicing and suggest how to fix)
 - rust-lang#114708 (Allow setting `rla` labels via `rustbot`)
 - rust-lang#117526 (Account for `!` arm in tail `match` expr)
 - rust-lang#118282 (effects: Run `enforce_context_effects` for all method calls)
 - rust-lang#118366 (Detect and reject malformed `repr(Rust)` hints)
 - rust-lang#118375 (Add -Zunpretty=stable-mir output test)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit dd3437b with merge e06c94d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing e06c94d to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing e06c94d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 28, 2023
@bors bors merged commit e06c94d into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 28, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e06c94d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 674.319s -> 673.509s (-0.12%)
Artifact size: 313.36 MiB -> 313.37 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants