Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #116636

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 15 commits October 4, 2023 04:22
…th-variance, r=lcnr

Relate alias ty with variance

In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀.

This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to `def_kind` is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider.

r? `@lcnr`
…lize-for-closure, r=lcnr

Structurally normalize for closure

Fixes some signature deduction problems in the new trait solver (and in the case of async, an ICE).

r? lcnr
use `PatKind::wild` when an ADT const value has violation

Fixes rust-lang#115599

Since the [to_pat](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111913/files#diff-6d8d99538aca600d633270051580c7a9e40b35824ea2863d9dda2c85a733b5d9R126-R155) behavior has been changed in the rust-lang#111913 update, the kind of `inlined_const_ast_pat` has transformed from `PatKind::Leaf { pattern: Pat { kind: Wild, ..} } ` to `PatKind::Constant`. This caused a scenario where there are no matched candidates, leading to a testing of the candidates. This process ultimately attempts to test the string const, triggering the `bug!` invocation finally.

r? `@oli-obk`
…l, r=notriddle

Prevent showing methods from blanket impls of not available foreign traits to show up in the search results

Fixes rust-lang#115480.

In the case that the blanket impl trait is not available in the current crate, we prevent adding its methods in the search index.

Now how I found how to fix the issue: the `equivalent` method is not generated in the documentation pages but was still added to the search index. To render impls, we iterate over `cache.impls` so I took a look at how this was generated. Inside `formats/cache.rs`, we have `CacheBuilder::populate` where we push impls into `impls` but with this condition:

```rust
if cx.cache.traits.contains_key(&trait_did) {
```

I re-used this condition in `CacheBuilder::fold_item` to prevent this method from being added in `cache.search_index` or `cache.orphan_impl_items`.

PS: If you want to double-check if the added test works, just comment the code I added in `cache.rs` and it should fail.

r? `@notriddle`
…orino

small cleanup

this is exactly the same as the `lower_param_bounds` function, so use that instead
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 11, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2023

📌 Commit 98a2de4 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115937) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 11, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

lol

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-5rdjosn branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants