Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts #116010

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023
Merged

interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts #116010

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

The diff in src/tools/miri/src/shims/x86/sse2.rs should hopefully suffice to explain why this is nicer. :)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 20, 2023

r? @wesleywiser

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 20, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 20, 2023

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

r? @oli-obk
I just hope this doesn't hurt perf...
@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rustbot rustbot assigned oli-obk and unassigned wesleywiser Sep 20, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 20, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 8f6f09f with merge cd97d47...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#116010 - RalfJung:more-typed-immediates, r=<try>
cd97d47 
interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts

The diff in src/tools/miri/src/shims/x86/sse2.rs should hopefully suffice to explain why this is nicer. :)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: cd97d47 (cd97d476f0b196d93a75bca05b909216f77b2c7c)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the more-typed-immediates branch from 8f6f09f to 23fd286 Compare September 20, 2023 21:06
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 20, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (cd97d47): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 1.2% [0.8%, 1.5%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 3.0% [3.0%, 3.0%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.0% [3.0%, 3.0%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.239s -> 631.895s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 317.84 MiB -> 317.46 MiB (-0.12%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 21, 2023
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

Argh these layout_of calls are expensive... at some point we might have to re-architect the interpreter to reduce how many of them we need.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 21, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 0eff07b with merge 42e6d87...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#116010 - RalfJung:more-typed-immediates, r=<try>
42e6d87 
interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts

The diff in src/tools/miri/src/shims/x86/sse2.rs should hopefully suffice to explain why this is nicer. :)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 42e6d87 (42e6d872ef567dda0780718aeb133e2e21693f42)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (42e6d87): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -3.5% [-3.5%, -3.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 631.763s -> 631.463s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 317.88 MiB -> 317.62 MiB (-0.08%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 21, 2023
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

Better. :)

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 21, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

📌 Commit 0eff07b has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 21, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 0eff07b with merge 0fd7ce9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 0fd7ce9 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 21, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 0fd7ce9 into rust-lang:master Sep 21, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 21, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0fd7ce9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 8.6% [8.6%, 8.7%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.454s -> 630.615s (-0.29%)
Artifact size: 317.88 MiB -> 317.63 MiB (-0.08%)

@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the more-typed-immediates branch September 22, 2023 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@oli-obk oli-obk

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.74.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@RalfJung @rustbot @rust-timer @bors @oli-obk @wesleywiser