Don't inline functions with unsized args

[JakobDegen]

Fixes #111355 .

I have some ideas for how we can get this back in the future, out of scope for this PR though.

r? @cjgillot

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[JakobDegen]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit e3c6278749aac887c9ef6694e41b07095e5b0d13 with merge 8f705f0a8cf3d7990c3b886c89615d90ee80479a...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 8f705f0a8cf3d7990c3b886c89615d90ee80479a (8f705f0a8cf3d7990c3b886c89615d90ee80479a)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (8f705f0a8cf3d7990c3b886c89615d90ee80479a): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 660.093s -> 659.309s (-0.12%)

[tmiasko]

Thanks!

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit b66a66a3555bccf60ec03531e5eed92f4d13a613 has been approved by tmiasko

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b66a66a3555bccf60ec03531e5eed92f4d13a613 with merge df243137dfb798aa9b4bea7ba250c7dcf32ea212...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[tmiasko]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 60cc72c has been approved by tmiasko

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 60cc72c with merge 0634557...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tmiasko
Pushing 0634557 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (0634557): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.8%	[3.8%, 3.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.6%	[3.3%, 3.9%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.5%	[-2.6%, -2.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.8%	[3.8%, 3.8%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 644.012s -> 643.639s (-0.06%)