Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions #109390

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

cbeuw
Copy link
Contributor

@cbeuw cbeuw commented Mar 20, 2023

Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir

r? @oli-obk or @tmiasko or @JakobDegen

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 20, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 20, 2023

This PR changes MIR

cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras

Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 20, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2023

📌 Commit f404f33 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 20, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions

Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir

r? `@oli-obk` or `@tmiasko` or `@JakobDegen`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions

Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir

r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@tmiasko`` or ``@JakobDegen``
Noratrieb added a commit to Noratrieb/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions

Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir

r? ```@oli-obk``` or ```@tmiasko``` or ```@JakobDegen```
Noratrieb added a commit to Noratrieb/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions

Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir

r? ````@oli-obk```` or ````@tmiasko```` or ````@JakobDegen````
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106434 (Document `Iterator::sum/product` for Option/Result)
 - rust-lang#108326 (Implement read_buf for a few more types)
 - rust-lang#108842 (Enforce non-lifetime-binders in supertrait preds are not object safe)
 - rust-lang#108896 (new solver: make all goal evaluation able to be automatically rerun )
 - rust-lang#109124 (Add `dist.compression-profile` option to control compression speed)
 - rust-lang#109240 (Walk un-shifted nested `impl Trait` in trait when setting up default trait method assumptions)
 - rust-lang#109385 (fix typo)
 - rust-lang#109386 (add myself to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#109390 (Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions)
 - rust-lang#109408 (not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b2e48ed into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 21, 2023
@cbeuw cbeuw deleted the aggregate-lit branch March 21, 2023 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants