Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Iterator::find: link to Iterator::position in docs for discoverability #106161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2022
Merged

Iterator::find: link to Iterator::position in docs for discoverability #106161

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2022

Conversation

meithecatte
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 26, 2022

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 26, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 26, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2022

📌 Commit 37b88c8 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 28, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#106228 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-jsznhww, r=matth…
9709a43 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104402 (Move `ReentrantMutex` to `std::sync`)
 - rust-lang#104493 (available_parallelism: Gracefully handle zero value cfs_period_us)
 - rust-lang#105359 (Make sentinel value configurable in `library/std/src/sys_common/thread_local_key.rs`)
 - rust-lang#105497 (Clarify `catch_unwind` docs about panic hooks)
 - rust-lang#105570 (Properly calculate best failure in macro matching)
 - rust-lang#105702 (Format only modified files)
 - rust-lang#105998 (adjust message on non-unwinding panic)
 - rust-lang#106161 (Iterator::find: link to Iterator::position in docs for discoverability)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 89ccd70 into rust-lang:master Dec 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.68.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@meithecatte @rustbot @Mark-Simulacrum @bors