Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

use consistent terminology #103715

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2022
Merged

use consistent terminology #103715

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2022

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

I did not see other traits using the "interface" word

@tshepang
use consistent terminology
a36a37e 
I did not see other traits using the "interface" word
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 29, 2022

r? @scottmcm

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 29, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 29, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 29, 2022

📌 Commit a36a37e has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 29, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#103745 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-hipjva8, r=matth…
4827cee 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100006 (Make `core::mem::copy` const)
 - rust-lang#102659 (1.65.0 release notes)
 - rust-lang#103124 (Add tests for autoderef on block tail)
 - rust-lang#103253 (rustdoc: add test case for masked blanket impl)
 - rust-lang#103715 (use consistent terminology)
 - rust-lang#103722 (Fix z-indexes of code example feature and cleanup its CSS)
 - rust-lang#103726 (Avoid unnecessary `&str` to `String` conversions)
 - rust-lang#103737 (rustdoc: use CSS margin/padding shorthand when all are being set)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e4821d7 into rust-lang:master Oct 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 30, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum modified the milestones: 1.66.0, 1.67.0 Oct 30, 2022
@tshepang tshepang deleted the consistency branch October 31, 2022 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@scottmcm scottmcm

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.67.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@tshepang @rustbot @Dylan-DPC @bors @Mark-Simulacrum @scottmcm