Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix grammar in docs for std::io::Read #103466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jruderman
Copy link
Contributor

Two independent clauses were incorrectly joined by a bare comma. The simplest fix would be to switch to a semicolon, but I think it's slightly better to keep the comma and use the coordinating conjunction "so".

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 24, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 24, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 24, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

thanks

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2022

📌 Commit f53b322 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Fix grammar in docs for std::io::Read

Two independent clauses were incorrectly joined by a bare comma. The simplest fix would be to switch to a semicolon, but I think it's slightly better to keep the comma and use the coordinating conjunction "so".
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#99578 (Remove redundant lifetime bound from `impl Borrow for Cow`)
 - rust-lang#99939 (Sort tests at compile time, not at startup)
 - rust-lang#102271 (Stabilize `duration_checked_float`)
 - rust-lang#102766 (Don't link to `libresolv` in libstd on Darwin)
 - rust-lang#103277 (Update libstd's libc to 0.2.135 (to make `libstd` no longer pull in `libiconv.dylib` on Darwin))
 - rust-lang#103437 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift)
 - rust-lang#103466 (Fix grammar in docs for std::io::Read)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a710f56 into rust-lang:master Oct 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants