Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Correct terminology in std::cmp #103046
docs: Correct terminology in std::cmp #103046
Changes from all commits
86b031b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reading this, I had the concerns that Ralf currently expressed.
PartialEq is slightly more than a partial equivalence relation per se, precisely because we do not usually discuss equivalence relations between different types. In the non-Self case, it is also the programmer's understanding of how the two types may be mapped into a larger space that contains the values of both types, which then contains equivalence relations and equivalence classes (or, in some cases, only partially so). I believe trying to express this by negation is part of why this documentation is so confused.
Obviously, in the simplest case, the mapping is the identity.
You do not need to address all of this problem, it is more a thought I had on how it might be improved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, thinking about it, it's the case even in the Self case, but there we can declare this as "working as intended": the interpretation operation, there, is the one intrinsic to the type.