Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #102362

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jhpratt and others added 6 commits September 7, 2022 21:59
LLVM 15 added `Optional::has_value`, and LLVM `main` (16) has deprecated
`hasValue`. However, its `explicit operator bool` does the same thing,
and was added long ago, so we can use that across our full LLVM range of
compatibility.
In rust-lang#101230, the internal diagnostic migration lints -
`diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` - were
modified so that they wouldn't trigger on functions annotated with
`#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. However, this change has to make it into
the bootstrap compiler before the `#[allow]` annotations that it aims to
remove can be removed, which is possible now that rust-lang#102051 has landed.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
…s, r=joshtriplett

Stabilize `#![feature(mixed_integer_ops)]`

Tracked and FCP completed in rust-lang#87840.

```@rustbot``` label +T-libs-api +S-waiting-on-review +relnotes

r? rust-lang/t-libs-api
Avoid LLVM-deprecated `Optional::hasValue`

LLVM 15 added `Optional::has_value`, and LLVM `main` (16) has deprecated
`hasValue`. However, its `explicit operator bool` does the same thing,
and was added long ago, so we can use that across our full LLVM range of
compatibility.
…mp-allow-lint, r=lcnr

session: remove now-unnecessary lint `#[allow]`s

In rust-lang#101230, the internal diagnostic migration lints - `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` - were modified so that they wouldn't trigger on functions annotated with `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. However, this change has to make it into the bootstrap compiler before the `#[allow]` annotations that it aims to remove can be removed, which is possible now that rust-lang#102051 has landed.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 27, 2022
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

📌 Commit aff319a has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit aff319a with merge 8f07a7cd00743098e191f4a819e820a6384362a9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 27, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Sep 28, 2022
@fee1-dead fee1-dead deleted the rollup-abpvqi8 branch September 28, 2022 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants