Some "this expression has a field"-related fixes #100098
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
r? rust-lang/diagnostics |
davidtwco
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2022
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2022
…ixups, r=davidtwco Some "this expression has a field"-related fixes Each commit does something different and is worth reviewing, but the final diff from `master..HEAD` contains the sum of the changes to the UI tests, since some commits added UI tests "regressions" which were later removed in other commits. The only change I could see adding on top of this is suppressing `Clone::clone` from the "this expression has a field that has this method" suggestion, since it's so commonly implemented by types that it's not worthwhile suggesting in general.
Merged
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98775 (rustdoc: improve scroll locking in the rustdoc mobile sidebars) - rust-lang#99479 (rustdoc-json: Remove doc FIXME for Import::id and explain) - rust-lang#100040 (Error on broken pipe but do not backtrace or ICE) - rust-lang#100072 (linker-plugin-lto.md: Correct the name of example c file) - rust-lang#100098 (Some "this expression has a field"-related fixes) - rust-lang#100226 (Do not manually craft a span pointing inside a multibyte character.) - rust-lang#100240 (Fail gracefully when const pattern is not structural match.) - rust-lang#100256 (Add some high-level docs to `FnCtxt` and `ItemCtxt`) - rust-lang#100261 (Set tainted errors bit before emitting coerce suggestions.) - rust-lang#100275 (also update anyhow in codegen_cranelift) - rust-lang#100281 (Remove more Clean trait implementations) - rust-lang#100314 (Mention `unit-test` in MIR opt test README) - rust-lang#100319 (Remove more Clean trait implementations) - rust-lang#100323 ([rustdoc] Don't render impl blocks with doc comment if they only contain private items by default) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Each commit does something different and is worth reviewing, but the final diff from
master..HEADcontains the sum of the changes to the UI tests, since some commits added UI tests "regressions" which were later removed in other commits.The only change I could see adding on top of this is suppressing
Clone::clonefrom the "this expression has a field that has this method" suggestion, since it's so commonly implemented by types that it's not worthwhile suggesting in general.