-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Codegen/allocator regression from 1.60 #97217
Labels
A-codegen
Area: Code generation
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
P-medium
Medium priority
regression-from-stable-to-stable
Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
The allocation also goes away with opt-level 3 if you pass |
workingjubilee
added
A-codegen
Area: Code generation
regression-from-stable-to-stable
Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.
labels
Jul 6, 2022
rustbot
added
the
I-prioritize
Issue: Indicates that prioritization has been requested for this issue.
label
Jul 6, 2022
WG-prioritization assigning priority (Zulip discussion). @rustbot label -I-prioritize +P-high |
rustbot
added
P-high
High priority
and removed
I-prioritize
Issue: Indicates that prioritization has been requested for this issue.
labels
Jul 6, 2022
T-compiler P-high review, adding T-compiler label. @rustbot label +T-compiler +A-LLVM |
rustbot
added
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Sep 30, 2022
T-compiler P-high review, downgrading to P-medium. @rustbot label: -P-high +P-medium |
TaKO8Ki
added a commit
to TaKO8Ki/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 27, 2023
…=nikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from ``@erikdesjardins`` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2023
…ikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
antoyo
pushed a commit
to antoyo/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2023
…ikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-codegen
Area: Code generation
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
P-medium
Medium priority
regression-from-stable-to-stable
Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
In 1.60 the following code causes no allocations:
However in nightly there is an allocation, see: https://godbolt.org/z/cq9b1Pnva
EDIT:
Appears there is also a problem with 1.60 and opt-level 2 vs 3: https://godbolt.org/z/8MWjEvPbh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: