We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://doc.rust-lang.org/guide-lifetimes.html#returning-references
struct Point {x: f64, y: f64} fn get_x_sh(p: &Point) -> &f64 { &p.x // Error reported here }
Thanks to lifetime elision this example now compiles successfully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Remove incorrect example
54fb8ba
This now works because of elision. Fixes rust-lang#16117
daaa20e
Auto merge of rust-lang#16117 - mustakimali:mo-order, r=Veykril
3c4d642
feat: completion list suggests constructor like & builder methods first When typing `MyType::` the completion items' order could be re-ordered based on how likely we want to select those: * Constructors: `new` like functions to be able to create the type, * Constructors that take args: Any other function that creates `Self`, * Builder Methods: any builder methods available, * Regular methods & associated functions (no change there) ![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/1546896/54593b91-07b3-455a-8a71-8d203d4eaf4a) In this photo, the order is: * `new` constructor is first * `new_builder` second is a builder method * `aaaanew` is a constructor that takes arguments, is third and is irrespective of its alphabetical order among names. --- Another Example using actix `HttpServer` shows preferring constructor without `self` arg first (the `new` method) ![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/1546896/938d3fb0-3d7a-4427-ae2f-ec02a834ccbe) ![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/1546896/2c13860c-efd1-459d-b25e-df8adb61bbd0) I've dropped my previous idea of highlighting these functions in the rustdoc (rust-lang#107926)
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
http://doc.rust-lang.org/guide-lifetimes.html#returning-references
Thanks to lifetime elision this example now compiles successfully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: