-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests/assembly/x86_64-bigint-add.rs broken with LLVM 20 #133754
Labels
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
krasimirgg
added
the
C-tracking-issue
Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
label
Dec 2, 2024
@rustbot label +A-LLVM |
rustbot
added
the
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
label
Dec 2, 2024
jieyouxu
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
and removed
C-tracking-issue
Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
labels
Dec 2, 2024
It looks like this is just a difference in unroll factor: https://www.diffchecker.com/qUdwbutN/ LLVM 20 unrolls this loop less aggressively. |
Merged
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2025
…wiser Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang#132957. Fixes rust-lang#133754.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
…wiser Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang#132957. Fixes rust-lang#133754.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
…wiser Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang#132957. Fixes rust-lang#133754.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
…wiser Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang#132957. Fixes rust-lang#133754.
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2025
…wiser Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang#132957. Fixes rust-lang#133754.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2025
Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang/rust#132957. Fixes rust-lang/rust#133754.
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/miri
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2025
Fix tests on LLVM 20 For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test. For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in. Fixes rust-lang/rust#132957. Fixes rust-lang/rust#133754.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
It looks like
tests/assembly/x86_64-bigint-add.rs broken
, newly added in 9836196, produces slightly different assembly with LLVM-at-HEAD:https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/builds/33017#01938775-555b-4915-9c10-08f40d14cdad/945-946
@scottmcm: does the new assembly produced look good? Happy to adapt the test for this.
cc: @scottmcm @durin42
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: