expand unused doc comment diagnostic

Report the diagnostic on macro expansions, and add a label indicating
why the comment is unused.

src/libcore/num/mod.rs

@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ macro_rules! rev {
     )*}
 }
 
-/// intra-sign conversions
+// intra-sign conversions
 try_from_upper_bounded!(u16, u8);
 try_from_upper_bounded!(u32, u16, u8);
 try_from_upper_bounded!(u64, u32, u16, u8);

src/librustc/hir/mod.rs

@@ -122,15 +122,15 @@ impl fmt::Display for HirId {
 // hack to ensure that we don't try to access the private parts of `ItemLocalId` in this module
 mod item_local_id_inner {
     use rustc_data_structures::indexed_vec::Idx;
-    /// An `ItemLocalId` uniquely identifies something within a given "item-like",
-    /// that is within a hir::Item, hir::TraitItem, or hir::ImplItem. There is no
-    /// guarantee that the numerical value of a given `ItemLocalId` corresponds to
-    /// the node's position within the owning item in any way, but there is a
-    /// guarantee that the `LocalItemId`s within an owner occupy a dense range of
-    /// integers starting at zero, so a mapping that maps all or most nodes within
-    /// an "item-like" to something else can be implement by a `Vec` instead of a
-    /// tree or hash map.
     newtype_index! {
+        /// An `ItemLocalId` uniquely identifies something within a given "item-like",
+        /// that is within a hir::Item, hir::TraitItem, or hir::ImplItem. There is no
+        /// guarantee that the numerical value of a given `ItemLocalId` corresponds to
+        /// the node's position within the owning item in any way, but there is a
+        /// guarantee that the `LocalItemId`s within an owner occupy a dense range of
+        /// integers starting at zero, so a mapping that maps all or most nodes within
+        /// an "item-like" to something else can be implement by a `Vec` instead of a
+        /// tree or hash map.
         pub struct ItemLocalId { .. }
     }
 }

src/librustc/middle/region.rs

@@ -132,25 +132,24 @@ pub enum ScopeData {
     Remainder(FirstStatementIndex)
 }
 
-/// Represents a subscope of `block` for a binding that is introduced
-/// by `block.stmts[first_statement_index]`. Such subscopes represent
-/// a suffix of the block. Note that each subscope does not include
-/// the initializer expression, if any, for the statement indexed by
-/// `first_statement_index`.
-///
-/// For example, given `{ let (a, b) = EXPR_1; let c = EXPR_2; ... }`:
-///
-/// * The subscope with `first_statement_index == 0` is scope of both
-///   `a` and `b`; it does not include EXPR_1, but does include
-///   everything after that first `let`. (If you want a scope that
-///   includes EXPR_1 as well, then do not use `Scope::Remainder`,
-///   but instead another `Scope` that encompasses the whole block,
-///   e.g., `Scope::Node`.
-///
-/// * The subscope with `first_statement_index == 1` is scope of `c`,
-///   and thus does not include EXPR_2, but covers the `...`.
-
 newtype_index! {
+    /// Represents a subscope of `block` for a binding that is introduced
+    /// by `block.stmts[first_statement_index]`. Such subscopes represent
+    /// a suffix of the block. Note that each subscope does not include
+    /// the initializer expression, if any, for the statement indexed by
+    /// `first_statement_index`.
+    ///
+    /// For example, given `{ let (a, b) = EXPR_1; let c = EXPR_2; ... }`:
+    ///
+    /// * The subscope with `first_statement_index == 0` is scope of both
+    ///   `a` and `b`; it does not include EXPR_1, but does include
+    ///   everything after that first `let`. (If you want a scope that
+    ///   includes EXPR_1 as well, then do not use `Scope::Remainder`,
+    ///   but instead another `Scope` that encompasses the whole block,
+    ///   e.g., `Scope::Node`.
+    ///
+    /// * The subscope with `first_statement_index == 1` is scope of `c`,
+    ///   and thus does not include EXPR_2, but covers the `...`.
     pub struct FirstStatementIndex { .. }
 }
 

src/librustc/ty/context.rs

@@ -1892,9 +1892,11 @@ pub mod tls {
         rayon_core::tlv::get()
     }
 
-    /// A thread local variable which stores a pointer to the current ImplicitCtxt
     #[cfg(not(parallel_compiler))]
-    thread_local!(static TLV: Cell<usize> = Cell::new(0));
+    thread_local! {
+        /// A thread local variable which stores a pointer to the current ImplicitCtxt.
+        static TLV: Cell<usize> = Cell::new(0);
+    }
 
     /// Sets TLV to `value` during the call to `f`.
     /// It is restored to its previous value after.
@@ -2011,10 +2013,11 @@ pub mod tls {
         })
     }
 
-    /// Stores a pointer to the GlobalCtxt if one is available.
-    /// This is used to access the GlobalCtxt in the deadlock handler
-    /// given to Rayon.
-    scoped_thread_local!(pub static GCX_PTR: Lock<usize>);
+    scoped_thread_local! {
+        /// Stores a pointer to the GlobalCtxt if one is available.
+        /// This is used to access the GlobalCtxt in the deadlock handler given to Rayon.
+        pub static GCX_PTR: Lock<usize>
+    }
 
     /// Creates a TyCtxt and ImplicitCtxt based on the GCX_PTR thread local.
     /// This is used in the deadlock handler.

src/librustc/ty/mod.rs

@@ -1512,42 +1512,42 @@ impl<'tcx> InstantiatedPredicates<'tcx> {
     }
 }
 
-/// "Universes" are used during type- and trait-checking in the
-/// presence of `for<..>` binders to control what sets of names are
-/// visible. Universes are arranged into a tree: the root universe
-/// contains names that are always visible. Each child then adds a new
-/// set of names that are visible, in addition to those of its parent.
-/// We say that the child universe "extends" the parent universe with
-/// new names.
-///
-/// To make this more concrete, consider this program:
-///
-/// ```
-/// struct Foo { }
-/// fn bar<T>(x: T) {
-///   let y: for<'a> fn(&'a u8, Foo) = ...;
-/// }
-/// ```
-///
-/// The struct name `Foo` is in the root universe U0. But the type
-/// parameter `T`, introduced on `bar`, is in an extended universe U1
-/// -- i.e., within `bar`, we can name both `T` and `Foo`, but outside
-/// of `bar`, we cannot name `T`. Then, within the type of `y`, the
-/// region `'a` is in a universe U2 that extends U1, because we can
-/// name it inside the fn type but not outside.
-///
-/// Universes are used to do type- and trait-checking around these
-/// "forall" binders (also called **universal quantification**). The
-/// idea is that when, in the body of `bar`, we refer to `T` as a
-/// type, we aren't referring to any type in particular, but rather a
-/// kind of "fresh" type that is distinct from all other types we have
-/// actually declared. This is called a **placeholder** type, and we
-/// use universes to talk about this. In other words, a type name in
-/// universe 0 always corresponds to some "ground" type that the user
-/// declared, but a type name in a non-zero universe is a placeholder
-/// type -- an idealized representative of "types in general" that we
-/// use for checking generic functions.
 newtype_index! {
+    /// "Universes" are used during type- and trait-checking in the
+    /// presence of `for<..>` binders to control what sets of names are
+    /// visible. Universes are arranged into a tree: the root universe
+    /// contains names that are always visible. Each child then adds a new
+    /// set of names that are visible, in addition to those of its parent.
+    /// We say that the child universe "extends" the parent universe with
+    /// new names.
+    ///
+    /// To make this more concrete, consider this program:
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// struct Foo { }
+    /// fn bar<T>(x: T) {
+    ///   let y: for<'a> fn(&'a u8, Foo) = ...;
+    /// }
+    /// ```
+    ///
+    /// The struct name `Foo` is in the root universe U0. But the type
+    /// parameter `T`, introduced on `bar`, is in an extended universe U1
+    /// -- i.e., within `bar`, we can name both `T` and `Foo`, but outside
+    /// of `bar`, we cannot name `T`. Then, within the type of `y`, the
+    /// region `'a` is in a universe U2 that extends U1, because we can
+    /// name it inside the fn type but not outside.
+    ///
+    /// Universes are used to do type- and trait-checking around these
+    /// "forall" binders (also called **universal quantification**). The
+    /// idea is that when, in the body of `bar`, we refer to `T` as a
+    /// type, we aren't referring to any type in particular, but rather a
+    /// kind of "fresh" type that is distinct from all other types we have
+    /// actually declared. This is called a **placeholder** type, and we
+    /// use universes to talk about this. In other words, a type name in
+    /// universe 0 always corresponds to some "ground" type that the user
+    /// declared, but a type name in a non-zero universe is a placeholder
+    /// type -- an idealized representative of "types in general" that we
+    /// use for checking generic functions.
     pub struct UniverseIndex {
         DEBUG_FORMAT = "U{}",
     }

src/librustc/ty/sty.rs

@@ -1082,46 +1082,46 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> ParamConst {
     }
 }
 
-/// A [De Bruijn index][dbi] is a standard means of representing
-/// regions (and perhaps later types) in a higher-ranked setting. In
-/// particular, imagine a type like this:
-///
-///     for<'a> fn(for<'b> fn(&'b isize, &'a isize), &'a char)
-///     ^          ^            |        |         |
-///     |          |            |        |         |
-///     |          +------------+ 0      |         |
-///     |                                |         |
-///     +--------------------------------+ 1       |
-///     |                                          |
-///     +------------------------------------------+ 0
-///
-/// In this type, there are two binders (the outer fn and the inner
-/// fn). We need to be able to determine, for any given region, which
-/// fn type it is bound by, the inner or the outer one. There are
-/// various ways you can do this, but a De Bruijn index is one of the
-/// more convenient and has some nice properties. The basic idea is to
-/// count the number of binders, inside out. Some examples should help
-/// clarify what I mean.
-///
-/// Let's start with the reference type `&'b isize` that is the first
-/// argument to the inner function. This region `'b` is assigned a De
-/// Bruijn index of 0, meaning "the innermost binder" (in this case, a
-/// fn). The region `'a` that appears in the second argument type (`&'a
-/// isize`) would then be assigned a De Bruijn index of 1, meaning "the
-/// second-innermost binder". (These indices are written on the arrays
-/// in the diagram).
-///
-/// What is interesting is that De Bruijn index attached to a particular
-/// variable will vary depending on where it appears. For example,
-/// the final type `&'a char` also refers to the region `'a` declared on
-/// the outermost fn. But this time, this reference is not nested within
-/// any other binders (i.e., it is not an argument to the inner fn, but
-/// rather the outer one). Therefore, in this case, it is assigned a
-/// De Bruijn index of 0, because the innermost binder in that location
-/// is the outer fn.
-///
-/// [dbi]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_index
 newtype_index! {
+    /// A [De Bruijn index][dbi] is a standard means of representing
+    /// regions (and perhaps later types) in a higher-ranked setting. In
+    /// particular, imagine a type like this:
+    ///
+    ///     for<'a> fn(for<'b> fn(&'b isize, &'a isize), &'a char)
+    ///     ^          ^            |        |         |
+    ///     |          |            |        |         |
+    ///     |          +------------+ 0      |         |
+    ///     |                                |         |
+    ///     +--------------------------------+ 1       |
+    ///     |                                          |
+    ///     +------------------------------------------+ 0
+    ///
+    /// In this type, there are two binders (the outer fn and the inner
+    /// fn). We need to be able to determine, for any given region, which
+    /// fn type it is bound by, the inner or the outer one. There are
+    /// various ways you can do this, but a De Bruijn index is one of the
+    /// more convenient and has some nice properties. The basic idea is to
+    /// count the number of binders, inside out. Some examples should help
+    /// clarify what I mean.
+    ///
+    /// Let's start with the reference type `&'b isize` that is the first
+    /// argument to the inner function. This region `'b` is assigned a De
+    /// Bruijn index of 0, meaning "the innermost binder" (in this case, a
+    /// fn). The region `'a` that appears in the second argument type (`&'a
+    /// isize`) would then be assigned a De Bruijn index of 1, meaning "the
+    /// second-innermost binder". (These indices are written on the arrays
+    /// in the diagram).
+    ///
+    /// What is interesting is that De Bruijn index attached to a particular
+    /// variable will vary depending on where it appears. For example,
+    /// the final type `&'a char` also refers to the region `'a` declared on
+    /// the outermost fn. But this time, this reference is not nested within
+    /// any other binders (i.e., it is not an argument to the inner fn, but
+    /// rather the outer one). Therefore, in this case, it is assigned a
+    /// De Bruijn index of 0, because the innermost binder in that location
+    /// is the outer fn.
+    ///
+    /// [dbi]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_index
     pub struct DebruijnIndex {
         DEBUG_FORMAT = "DebruijnIndex({})",
         const INNERMOST = 0,