Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump cargo_metadata to 0.8.0 #4160

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2019
Merged

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Jun 1, 2019

changelog: none

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r+
thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

📌 Commit d6f580d has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

⌛ Testing commit d6f580d with merge 36baf5f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2019
Bump cargo_metadata to 0.8.0

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@tesuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

tesuji commented Jun 2, 2019

Network errror?

@tesuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

tesuji commented Jun 2, 2019

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

@lzutao: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

⌛ Testing commit d6f580d with merge f5d6804...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2019
Bump cargo_metadata to 0.8.0

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing f5d6804 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d6f580d into rust-lang:master Jun 2, 2019
@tesuji tesuji deleted the bump-cargo_metadata branch June 2, 2019 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants