Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't lint implicit_return on proc macros #12963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lochetti
Copy link
Contributor

This pr fixes #12872

changelog: [implicit_return]: Don't lint on procedural macros.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 19, 2024

r? @Centri3

rustbot has assigned @Centri3.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 19, 2024
@Centri3
Copy link
Member

Centri3 commented Jun 19, 2024

LGTM ^-^

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 19, 2024

📌 Commit b147b6d has been approved by Centri3

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 19, 2024

⌛ Testing commit b147b6d with merge 4aee08f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 19, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Centri3
Pushing 4aee08f to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4aee08f into rust-lang:master Jun 19, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

implicit_return false positive inside tauri::command macro
4 participants