Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Set RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN and invoke the proxies instead of directly invoking sysroot binaries #16563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Feb 14, 2024

cc #16537 should fix #16561

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 14, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Feb 14, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2024

📌 Commit 465ddef has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 465ddef with merge 004190b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 004190b to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 004190b to master...

@bors bors merged commit 004190b into rust-lang:master Feb 14, 2024
11 checks passed
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2024

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Changes must be made through a pull request.

@Veykril Veykril deleted the fix-rustup-toolchain-bins branch February 16, 2024 09:01
@darichey
Copy link
Contributor

darichey commented Feb 27, 2024

I think this regresses #15560. If you don't have rustup installed, there are no proxies to invoke (and additionally you don't have any other rustc on your PATH). Happy to open a PR if you can advise on the approach.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Feb 27, 2024

Right, in that case we don't even need the vars since cargo is no longer involved, #16693 should fix that I believe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cargo metadata exited with an error: error: could not execute process rustc -vV (never executed)
4 participants