Allow unauthenticated users to apply the waiting-on-author label
#632
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Given that they can set pretty much all the other flags (including e.g. nominating an issue), adding/removing `waiting-on-author` fits in that workflow and so seems sensible to add.
|
I ran into this here: #587 (comment) During an earlier Libs-API call the team asked the PR's author to provide a table that would show how the various integer and The author now provided that info so the next logical step is to nominate the issue (which I was able to do) and remove It feels to me that if we're allowing non-libs people to nominate issues and similar, this isn't a step too far. |
cuviper
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Given that they can set pretty much all the other flags (including e.g. nominating an issue), adding/removing
waiting-on-authorfits in that workflow and so seems sensible to add.