-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some book typos #695
Fix some book typos #695
Conversation
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ The conclusion from all of this is that it is perfectly safe to rule out impls t | |||
|
|||
**Downstream Crates:** Downstream crates come into play because all traits in upstream crates and in the current crate can potentially be implemented by downstream crates using the forms allowed by the orphan rules. In essence, we always need to assume that downstream crates will implement traits in all ways that compile. | |||
|
|||
## Discussion: Modelling the Overlap Check | |||
## Discussion: Modeling the Overlap Check |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like one or 2 L's are both fine, depending on whether it's American English or not. But I think we default to American English in most places, so 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I had no idea that it was correct in non American English. I can leave it as it was.
book/src/types/rust_types.md
Outdated
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ them in the [aliases chapter](./rust_types/alias.md). | |||
The `BoundVar` variant represents some variable that is bound in | |||
an outer term. For example, given a term like `forall<X> { | |||
Implemented(X: Trait) }`, the `X` is bound. Bound variables in chalk | |||
(like rustc) use de bruijin indices (See below). | |||
(like rustc) use de bruijn indices (See below). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should change this to "De Bruijn indices"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed all occurrences to De Bruijn
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 574ea9d has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
I think these changes are correct but check it out just in case, there's one or two that I'm not 100% sure.