Fix Apple deployment version floor when linking C++ #901
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
NobodyXu
requested changes
Nov 14, 2023
BlackHoleFox
force-pushed
the
apple-cplusplus-legacy
branch
from
d102cd8 to
188e2a0
Compare
NobodyXu
requested changes
Nov 14, 2023
BlackHoleFox
force-pushed
the
apple-cplusplus-legacy
branch
from
188e2a0 to
0f40f29
Compare
thomcc
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2023
NobodyXu
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2023
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
…v-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. `@BlackHoleFox` wdyt? `@rustbot` label O-apple r? compiler
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2024
…v-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. ``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt? ``@rustbot`` label O-apple r? compiler
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
…v-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. `@BlackHoleFox` wdyt? `@rustbot` label O-apple r? compiler
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
…v-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. ``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt? ``@rustbot`` label O-apple r? compiler
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133041 - madsmtm:print-deployment-target-env-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. ``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt? ``@rustbot`` label O-apple r? compiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Like the title says :) This fixes an unfortunate mixture of #848 and #872 so that the baseline version for modern C++ on Apple targets is respected again, so they now link the right C++ stdlib again.
Fixes #900