-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rustdoc nocapture #9705
Rustdoc nocapture #9705
Conversation
r? @Eh2406 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
12e27f3
to
287987e
Compare
287987e
to
0b39bb9
Compare
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #10408) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Closing as this is a bit stale. I'm also not clear what this was needed, since it looks like one can just pass |
The current cargo doesn't work, I assume because |
Is this fixed? |
Doesn't seem like.. but in the interim, try this:
|
@ehuss @GuillaumeGomez Can you please consider reopening this? It seems the hard work has already been done in rustdoc, and but given most people use rustdoc via cargo, it's availability is quite hindered. Or am I misinterpreting the state of |
I can't reopen it so I'll let it up to cargo team. |
Following rust-lang/rust#86230.
It might need to wait for rustdoc latest nightly to be published first to pass CI though (so tomorrow).
Also: the
--nocapture
option is unstable for now in rustdoc, is there something particular to be done until it's stable on cargo side? For now I simply add-Zunstable-options
but not sure if it's the way to go?