Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encourage tools writers to explicitly pin metadata version #3841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2017

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Mar 17, 2017

We do support versioning of metadata, but let's encourage tool's writers to actually use it.

They might not realize that this flag exists at all, or they can be too lazy (like myself :( ) to use it.

We can also make this flag mandatory, but I think that's a little bit to far.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

matklad referenced this pull request in oli-obk/cargo_metadata Mar 17, 2017
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2017

📌 Commit 6585dca has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 6585dca with merge e75253f...

@matklad matklad force-pushed the encourage-explicit-version branch from 6585dca to 624493c Compare March 17, 2017 15:43
@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented Mar 21, 2017

@bors: r=alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2017

📌 Commit 624493c has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 624493c with merge 3cac894...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2017
Encourage tools writers to explicitly pin metadata version

We do support versioning of metadata, but let's encourage tool's writers to actually use it.

They might not realize that this flag exists at all, or they can be too lazy (like myself :( ) to use it.

We can also make this flag mandatory, but I think that's a little bit to far.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 3cac894 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 624493c into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2017
@matklad matklad deleted the encourage-explicit-version branch March 27, 2017 10:03
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2017
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.18.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants