Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cli): Help users know possible --target values #12607

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Aug 31, 2023

What does this PR try to resolve?

I was needing to do some more cross-compilation and forgot what the target triple was that I needed to run. I realized i had to re-remember the command yet again. Especially with #12585 in memory, I realized that --target isn't working like --package and other arguments that can report supported values.

In working on it, I realized I probably didn't want to report supported values yet out of concern for how big the list is (see also #12585), so I decided to just list the relevant commands for now. We might be able to parse the rustup output to report those targets but I didn't receive a glowing endorsement from the rustup team about parsing the list (more of "yes, hyrums law and at least its interactive rather than CI").

Before:

error: a value is required for '--target <TRIPLE>' but none was supplied

For more information, try '--help'.

After:

error: "--target" takes a target architecture as an argument.

Run `rustup target list` to see possible targets.

(quotes were used because the other "list available" use them, we should probably work to be uniform in how we quote)

How should we test and review this PR?

First PR adds a test showing the existing output and then through the rest you can see how the output changed

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 31, 2023

r? @weihanglo

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-cli Area: Command-line interface, option parsing, etc. Command-clean Command-fetch Command-package Command-publish Command-tree S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2023
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Compilation Options:
--profile <PROFILE-NAME> Build artifacts with the specified profile
-j, --jobs <N> Number of parallel jobs, defaults to # of CPUs.
--keep-going Do not abort the build as soon as there is an error
--target <TRIPLE> Build for the target triple
--target [<TRIPLE>] Build for the target triple
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wish we could have a way to avoid this showing as optional 🥲.

(Never mind we already have this issue everywhere.)

let cmd = if is_rustup() {
"rustup target list"
} else {
"ustc --print target-list"
Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo Aug 31, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a real objection. Just this recommendation could often be false when using +channel command line override.

And typo

Suggested change
"ustc --print target-list"
"rustc --print target-list"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo fixed. I can go either way in how we handle the recommendation.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

match target_data.config.get_env("RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN") {
Ok(rustup_toolchain) => {
anyhow::bail!("{} --toolchain {}", msg, rustup_toolchain);
}
Err(_) => {
anyhow::bail!(msg);
}
}

We've already got something alike, though applying toolchain doesn't seem too useful. The output of rustup target list shouldn't change too much across versions, and people doing weird stuff usually know the trick.

I'll merge it as is.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2023

📌 Commit 802cb38 has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 802cb38 with merge 77a9b2d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 77a9b2d to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 77a9b2d to master...

@bors bors merged commit 77a9b2d into rust-lang:master Aug 31, 2023
19 checks passed
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2023

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Changes must be made through a pull request.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Update cargo

21 commits in 96fe1c9e1aecd8f57063e3753969bb6418fd2fd5..d14c85f4e6e7671673b1a1bc87231ff7164761e1
2023-08-29 20:10:34 +0000 to 2023-09-05 22:28:10 +0000
- fix(resolver): Make resolver behavior independent of package order (rust-lang/cargo#12602)
- cargo-credential: change serialization of cache expiration (rust-lang/cargo#12622)
- Update registry-web-api.md yank/unyank comments (rust-lang/cargo#12619)
- test: new options of debuginfo are no longer unstable (rust-lang/cargo#12618)
- use split_once for cleaner code (rust-lang/cargo#12615)
- stop using lazy_static (rust-lang/cargo#12616)
- doc: adjust all doc headings one level up (rust-lang/cargo#12595)
- chore(deps): update compatible (rust-lang/cargo#12609)
- chore(deps): update rust crate cargo_metadata to 0.17.0 (rust-lang/cargo#12610)
- Prepare for partial-version package specs (rust-lang/cargo#12591)
- refactor: Use more serde_untagged (rust-lang/cargo#12581)
- fix(cli): Help users know possible `--target` values (rust-lang/cargo#12607)
- Tab completion for --target uses rustup but fallsback to rustc (rust-lang/cargo#12606)
- Fewer temporary needless strings (rust-lang/cargo#12604)
- fix(help): Provide better commands heading for styling (rust-lang/cargo#12593)
- fix(update): Clarify meaning of --aggressive as --recursive (rust-lang/cargo#12544)
- docs(changelog): Clarify language for Cargo.lock policy (rust-lang/cargo#12601)
- fix typo: "default branch branch" -&gt; "default branch" (rust-lang/cargo#12598)
- fix: add error for unsupported credential provider version (rust-lang/cargo#12590)
- fix(help): Explain --explain (rust-lang/cargo#12592)
- fix(help): Remove redundant information from new/init (rust-lang/cargo#12594)

r? ghost
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-cli Area: Command-line interface, option parsing, etc. Command-clean Command-fetch Command-package Command-publish Command-tree S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants