-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with optional = true
#11434
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @ehuss (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Nov 28, 2022
> Adapted from rust-lang#11183 Previously, `is_dep_activated` depends on `activated_dependencies`, which is a map of `PackageFeaturesKey` to its own activated `DepFeature`s. `PackageFeaturesKey` in feature resolver is always comprised of * A `PackageId` of a given dependency, and * A enum value that helps decoupling activated features for that dependency. Currently depending on the type of given dependency. Looking into issue 10526, it has an `activated_dependencies` of ``` { (mycrate, NormalOrDev) -> [dep:mybindep] } ``` However, this [line][1] accidentally use a parent's `pkgid` and a dependency's `FeaturesFor` to compose a key: ``` (mycrate, ArtifactDep("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")) ``` That is never a valid key to query features for artifacts dependency. A valid key should be comprised of components both from the parent: ``` (mycrate, NormalOrDev) ``` Or both from the dependency itself: ``` (mybindep, ArtifactDep("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")) ``` This `unit_for` is from parent and should already contain its own artifact dep information inside `artifact_target_for_features`, so we don't need to map any dependency artifact from `dep.artifact()`. [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/a2ea66bea6fe8156444144e98911d073d56c2c0c/src/cargo/core/compiler/unit_dependencies.rs#L1106-L1107
`{ …, artifact = "bin", target = "target" }` should also be considered to being built for `FeaturesFor::ArtifactDep` instead of `NormalOrDev`. [This line][1] requests for `ArtifactDep` but [here][2] Cargo ignore assumed host target of artifact dep. Change it to explicit set host target triple when - `{ …, target = "target" }`, and - `--target` is not presented, meaning it would be build on host platform. [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/1382b44e431f58199afdffc2b757962b0e163602/src/cargo/core/compiler/unit_dependencies.rs#L887 [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/1382b44e431f58199afdffc2b757962b0e163602/src/cargo/core/resolver/features.rs#L857
weihanglo
force-pushed
the
issue/10526
branch
from
December 4, 2022 11:44
ce9d5ff
to
5b8985a
Compare
ehuss
reviewed
Dec 13, 2022
Was a regression test ever added that would catch the regression in #11330? |
I believe the regression test was done in #11342 |
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 13, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
weihanglo
added a commit
to weihanglo/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d 2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000 - artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434) - Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359) - Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475) - Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474) - Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450) - fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323) - Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470) - resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469)
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
Update cargo 8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d 2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000 - artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434) - Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359) - Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475) - Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474) - Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450) - fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323) - Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470) - resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469) r? `@ghost`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Another attempt to fix #10526 after #11183 failed.
You can find an explanation of the bug in #11183 or in the commit message.
How should we test and review this PR?
This first two commits log the current "incorrect" behaviour.
Other commits contain fixes respectively.
You may find more details in the commit messages.