Enhanced RDoc for Document #47
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@kou, did you see this one? I left it as a draft b/c it has a problem with a call-seq. |
|
It seems that the |
|
A workaround for the rdoc bug is to omit the call-seq for expanded_name, which is now done here. I'll have to study how to correctly submit a bug for RDoc. |
|
@kou, now ready for review. |
|
@kou said:
|
|
Restored the call-seq for Document#expanded_name. |
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revises prefatory material, and methods:
Note well: When I run this through rdoc, the call-seq for method expanded_name, and its aliased method name, does not show up. I have no theory that explains that.