Allow wider use of gtsave() with gt_group objects
#1365
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
❌ Deploy Preview for quarto-gt-examples failed.
|
* master: Update build-site.yaml
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This provides greater compatibility of
gt_groupobjects (created viagt_split()orgt_group()) withgtsave(). Previously, we could generate standalone Word and RTF documents from these objects but the work here now allows for HTML and LaTeX document generation. Attempting to create a PDF or PNG from agt_groupobject results in an error (as before), though now there is a clear explanation and workaround offered.Fixes: #1354