Remove OCSP stapling #1557
Merged
Remove OCSP stapling #1557
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Let's Encrypt is ending its OCSP support. See https://letsencrypt.org/2024/12/05/ending-ocsp/ for the timeline. This removes all OCSP stapling functionality in Trellis. While this could be kept for other SSL certificate providers, there are a few reasons to remove this entirely: 1. the certificate authority would need to provide OCSP support 2. the vast majority of Trellis users use Let's Encrypt only 3. there are privacy concerns regardless
tangrufus
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Let's Encrypt is ending its OCSP support. See
https://letsencrypt.org/2024/12/05/ending-ocsp/ for the timeline.
This removes all OCSP stapling functionality in Trellis. While this could be kept for other SSL certificate providers, there are a few reasons to remove this entirely: