Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add module retraction for accidental v0.6.0 tag #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

tzdybal
Copy link
Member

@tzdybal tzdybal commented Sep 9, 2024

Overview

Resolves #96

This retraction prevents users from mistakenly using the incorrect v0.6.0 version. The change clarifies the intended versions available for use.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Corrected versioning information by retracting the accidental version v0.6.0 in the module's dependency management. This change clarifies the intended state of the module's dependencies without affecting existing functionality.

@tzdybal tzdybal self-assigned this Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a retraction of the version v0.6.0 in the go.mod file. This action corrects an accidental tagging of the version, ensuring that it is no longer considered valid within the module's dependency management. The change maintains the existing functionality and logic of the codebase while clarifying the intended state of the module's dependencies.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Added retract v0.6.0 to correct versioning

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where bunnies play,
A version was tagged, but led astray.
With a hop and a skip, we set it right,
Retraction in place, now all is bright!
Dependencies clear, like the sky so blue,
Hooray for the changes, we bid adieu! 🌼

Tip

Announcements
  • The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment.
  • We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dfb28d4 and b1e1896.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • go.mod

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, tuxcanfly, gupadhyaya and Manav-Aggarwal and removed request for a team September 9, 2024 13:51
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2dafc50 and dfb28d4.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • go.mod

This retraction prevents users from mistakenly using the incorrect v0.6.0 version. The change clarifies the intended versions available for use.
@tzdybal tzdybal force-pushed the tzdybal/retract_v060 branch from dfb28d4 to b1e1896 Compare September 10, 2024 12:08
@tzdybal tzdybal enabled auto-merge September 10, 2024 12:09
@tzdybal tzdybal requested a review from MSevey September 12, 2024 06:28
Copy link
Contributor

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK.

@tzdybal tzdybal added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 875d37e Sep 13, 2024
14 checks passed
@tzdybal tzdybal deleted the tzdybal/retract_v060 branch September 13, 2024 00:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Retract v0.6.0
3 participants