added a logical type comparison method to use when asserting that two values are equal #15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
March 9, 2017 14:58
|
@jblack10101 thank you for the pull request, but it was decided to go with flexible interfaces. Please take a look at v.1.2.x. where you could write your own comparator and use it with BTS__EqValues method. I would appreciate any comments on this from you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I ran into a type comparison problem when writing a unit test to compare that two arrays were equivalent after adding an element to the array. The value being added to the array was of type 'Integer' and the other values in the array were 'roInteger'. So, I added a logical type comparison method to use when assertEqual is called.