Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/documentation samples restructuring #32

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019
Merged

Bugfix/documentation samples restructuring #32

merged 22 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019

Conversation

blockscoped
Copy link
Contributor

n conjunction with a change to the rooibosC pre-processor this change introduces a more structured approach towards directory naming and hierarchy.
All rooibos related framework files/components are now under a rooibos directory, and all test specs are under a specs directory.
This makes for a clear separation between framework files which in general shouldn't be edited, and user test specs which should.

User do not have to follow this exact naming convention as the RooibosC pre-processor is now more adaptable to different directory structures, but these conventions provide a good guide for structuring a codebase.

Add compiled version of `rooibos.cat.brs` with proper Roku comment syntax to avoid compile errors.
Remove the `rooibosDist.brs` file to avoid compile errors when running the nonEval sample code.
Add `rooibosFunctionMap.brs` to `nonEvalSample/source/tests` as this is referenced from `nonEvalSample/components/tests/NodeExampleTests.xml` and project won't compile without it.
…ch files are part of the framework and which are test specs.
…ontrol. Add .rooibosrc.json files for use with rooibosC preprocessor
@georgejecook georgejecook merged commit 6df6188 into rokucommunity:master Mar 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants