Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Clarify comment about having to continuously check in for TTL checks #219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2017
Merged

Clarify comment about having to continuously check in for TTL checks #219

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2017

Conversation

alugowski
Copy link
Contributor

If someone is only starting out with Consul they may think calling pass() once, like in the example, is enough. For example they may think the client library will ensure the Dead Man Switch is maintained. Moving the comment about the user being responsible to be next to the pass() call should make it more clear for new users.

If someone is only starting out with Consul they may think calling `pass()` once, like in the example, is enough. For example they may think the client library will ensure the Dead Man Switch is maintained. Moving the comment about the user being responsible to be next to the `pass()` call should make it more clear for new users.
@alugowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made this mistake so I'm hoping to save others :)

@rickfast rickfast merged commit bb9a855 into rickfast:master Feb 11, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants