Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency coverage to v7.6.7 #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Update dependency coverage to v7.6.7 #35

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 15, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
coverage ==7.6.4 -> ==7.6.7 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

nedbat/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.6.7

Compare Source

  • fix: ugh, the other assert from 7.6.5 can also be encountered in the wild,
    so it's been restored to a conditional. Sorry for the churn.

.. _changes_7-6-6:

v7.6.6

Compare Source

  • One of the new asserts from 7.6.5 caused problems in real projects, as
    reported in issue 1891_. The assert has been removed.

.. _issue 1891:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/18911

.. _changes_7-6-5:

v7.6.5

Compare Source

  • fix: fine-tuned the exact Python version (3.12.6) when exiting from with
    statements changed how they traced. This affected whether people saw the
    fix for issue 1880_.

  • fix: isolate our code more from mocking in the os module that in rare cases
    can cause bizarre behavior <pytest-cov-666_>_.

  • refactor: some code unreachable code paths in parser.py were changed to
    asserts. If you encounter any of these, please let me know!

.. _pytest-cov-666:https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/issues/6666

.. _changes_7-6-4:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Nov 15, 2024

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: pdm.lock
Command failed: pdm update --no-sync --update-eager coverage
WARNING: Project requires a python version of >=3.9, The virtualenv is being created for you as it cannot be matched to the right version.
INFO: python.use_venv is on, creating a virtualenv for this project...
Virtualenv is created successfully at /tmp/renovate/repos/github/rhel-lightspeed/command-line-assistant/.venv
[ProjectError]: coverage does not exist in default, but exists in dev. Please specify the correct group with `-G/--group`.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch from e5cb4dd to 10068a5 Compare November 16, 2024 08:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency coverage to v7.6.5 Update dependency coverage to v7.6.7 Nov 16, 2024
@r0x0d r0x0d merged commit 750b362 into main Nov 18, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@r0x0d r0x0d deleted the renovate/coverage-7.x branch November 18, 2024 11:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant