Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Split exec function to smaller blocks #11093

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 12, 2021

Conversation

zharinov
Copy link
Collaborator

@zharinov zharinov commented Aug 4, 2021

Changes:

Split large exec() function into smaller functions that hopefully are more understandable.

Context:

We're about to implement cache volumes that would complicate it even more. So, I've refactored it here.

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please tick one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@zharinov zharinov force-pushed the refactor/exec-internals branch from 025f9f7 to 9c03a98 Compare August 6, 2021 12:54
@rarkins rarkins requested a review from viceice August 11, 2021 09:46
@rarkins rarkins enabled auto-merge (squash) August 12, 2021 11:09
@rarkins rarkins disabled auto-merge August 12, 2021 14:47
@rarkins rarkins merged commit 64754e6 into renovatebot:main Aug 12, 2021
@rarkins rarkins deleted the refactor/exec-internals branch August 12, 2021 14:47
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 25.72.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants