Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: do not set bad for rerender errors #2984

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

fix: do not set bad for rerender errors #2984

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

beckermr
Copy link
Contributor

@beckermr beckermr commented Sep 3, 2024

Description:

This PR fixes a bug where rerender errors were making nodes be flagged as bad. It happened because we moved rerendering to containers so the error string changed.

Checklist:

  • Pydantic model updated or no update needed

Cross-refs, links to issues, etc:

xref: #2961

@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

beckermr commented Sep 3, 2024

pre-commit.ci autofix

@beckermr beckermr added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.74%. Comparing base (801756e) to head (3a665e4).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
conda_forge_tick/auto_tick.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2984      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.83%   75.74%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines       12175    12175              
==========================================
- Hits         9233     9222      -11     
- Misses       2942     2953      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Merged via the queue into main with commit 9c085eb Sep 3, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@beckermr beckermr deleted the beckermr-patch-4 branch September 3, 2024 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant