You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 17, 2021. It is now read-only.
For the moment the added license header is consistent with the other
headers of the package.
However, a global rework of license headers in `rh-che` might be
necessary as stated in issue
redhat-developer#192
Signed-off-by: David Festal <dfestal@redhat.com>
For the moment the added license header is consistent with the other
headers of the package.
However, a global rework of license headers in `rh-che` might be
necessary as stated in issue
#192
Signed-off-by: David Festal <dfestal@redhat.com>
As for the license type I would say EPL. @gorkem ?
For the copyright headers I think most of the java source files already have one and we should verify it and enforce a check at build time (for .xml, .sh etc...too of course).
There is no LICENSE file nor license header in source code files (java, xml ...)
Which license are we suppose to use ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: