Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade anyio from 3.7.1 to 4.4.0 #19

Closed
wants to merge 561 commits into from

Conversation

spolti
Copy link

@spolti spolti commented Jun 26, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • docs/requirements-docs.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

comaniac and others added 30 commits May 6, 2024 11:31
Co-authored-by: Simon Mo <simon.mo@hey.com>
…les (vllm-project#4343)

Co-authored-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Co-authored-by: Antoni Baum <antoni.baum@protonmail.com>
)

Co-authored-by: DefTruth <31974251+deftruth@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <prashantgupta@us.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Johnson <tjohnson31415@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Shaw <114415538+robertgshaw2-neuralmagic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Shaw <rshaw@neuralmagic.com>
…project#3922)

Co-authored-by: alexm <alexm@neuralmagic.com>
Co-authored-by: mgoin <michael@neuralmagic.com>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <prashantgupta@us.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <ywang@roblox.com>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Moritz <pcmoritz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Co-authored-by: mgoin <michael@neuralmagic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Co-authored-by: Cody Yu <hao.yu.cody@gmail.com>
…int (vllm-project#3467)

Co-authored-by: Lily Liu <lilyliupku@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
openshift-merge-bot bot and others added 24 commits May 22, 2024 17:29
Still included in built docker images
Gotta get conflicts with the main line figured resolved first. Just
don't use the shared tokenizer for now.

Signed-off-by: Travis Johnson <tsjohnso@us.ibm.com>
Upgraded the requests and aiohttp depenencies
fixes RHOAIENG-8043

Co-authored-by: Chih-Chieh-Yang <chih.chieh.yang@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Parnell <tpa@zurich.ibm.com>
- get rid cuda-devel stage, use cuda 12.4
- add build flags
- remove useless installs
…main

sync release with main @ v0.5.0.post1-99-g8720c92e
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-ANYIO-7361842
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-ANYIO-7361842
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: spolti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dtrifiro dtrifiro closed this Sep 10, 2024
moulalis pushed a commit to moulalis/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Update dockerfile.ubi to build vllm using wheels! I had to update some
`init` files since we need those packages to be picked up when building
the wheel for vllm.

### Integration tests


https://v3.travis.ibm.com/github/ai-foundation/fmaas-inference-server/builds/17962397

Image pushed to quay for testing:
```
quay.io/wxpe/tgis-vllm:release-vllm-wheel.eec7a7b
```

<img width="1020" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-23 at 12 18 00"
src="https://github.com/IBM/vllm/assets/9909241/f261bc38-d1f9-4d1a-a5d6-9db14aa362a6">

Useful command to build the above tests:
```
env:
  global:
    - REMOTE_INTEGRATION_TESTS=true
    - REMOTE_INTEGRATION_TEST_IMAGE=quay.io/wxpe/tgis-vllm:release-vllm-wheel.eec7a7b
    - REMOTE_INTEGRATION_TEST_CONFIG=product.vllm
```
---

<details>
<!-- inside this <details> section, markdown rendering does not work, so
we use raw html here. -->
<summary><b> PR Checklist (Click to Expand) </b></summary>

<p>Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull
request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps
vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review
process.</p>

<h3>PR Title and Classification</h3>
<p>Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed
appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the
following:</p>
<ul>
    <li><code>[Bugfix]</code> for bug fixes.</li>
<li><code>[CI/Build]</code> for build or continuous integration
improvements.</li>
<li><code>[Doc]</code> for documentation fixes and improvements.</li>
<li><code>[Model]</code> for adding a new model or improving an existing
model. Model name should appear in the title.</li>
<li><code>[Frontend]</code> For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g.,
OpenAI API server, <code>LLM</code> class, etc.) </li>
<li><code>[Kernel]</code> for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other
compute kernels.</li>
<li><code>[Core]</code> for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,
<code>LLMEngine</code>, <code>AsyncLLMEngine</code>,
<code>Scheduler</code>, etc.)</li>
<li><code>[Hardware][Vendor]</code> for hardware-specific changes.
Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,
<code>[Hardware][AMD]</code>).</li>
<li><code>[Misc]</code> for PRs that do not fit the above categories.
Please use this sparingly.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> If the PR spans more than one category, please
include all relevant prefixes.</p>

<h3>Code Quality</h3>

<p>The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:</p>

<ul>
<li>We adhere to <a
href="https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html">Google Python
style guide</a> and <a
href="https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html">Google C++
style guide</a>.</li>
<li>Pass all linter checks. Please use <a
href="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/format.sh"><code>format.sh</code></a>
to format your code.</li>
<li>The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors
can easily understand the code.</li>
<li>Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and
robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.</li>
<li>Please add documentation to <code>docs/source/</code> if the PR
modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user
understand and utilize the new features or changes.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Notes for Large Changes</h3>
<p>Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major
architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we
would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and
justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with <code>rfc-required</code>
and might not go through the PR.</p>

<h3>What to Expect for the Reviews</h3>

<p>The goal of the vLLM team is to be a <i>transparent reviewing
machine</i>. We would like to make the review process transparent and
efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated.
However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over
others. Here is what you can expect from the review process: </p>

<ul>
<li> After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer.
Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and
availability.</li>
<li> After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update
every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel
free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.</li>
<li> After the review, the reviewer will put an <code>
action-required</code> label on the PR if there are changes required.
The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to
re-review the PR.</li>
<li> Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a
comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask
for clarification or discuss the suggestion.
 </li>
</ul>

<h3>Thank You</h3>

<p> Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and
for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM
a great tool for everyone! </p>


</details>

---------

Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <prashantgupta@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.