Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Always use local theme #1083

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2021
Merged

Docs: Always use local theme #1083

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2021

Conversation

Blendify
Copy link
Member

This changes non PR builds on rtd to use the local theme and not the old 0.4.3 theme. We want our docs to show what the theme looks like based on the current release, not an old version.

This changes non PR builds on rtd to use the local theme and not the old 0.4.3 theme. We want our docs to show what the theme looks like based on the current release, not an old version.
@Blendify Blendify requested review from agjohnson and a team March 12, 2021 20:04
@stsewd stsewd merged commit ba1cbb1 into master Mar 12, 2021
@stsewd stsewd deleted the Blendify/docs-local-theme branch March 12, 2021 20:17
@agjohnson agjohnson restored the Blendify/docs-local-theme branch March 12, 2021 20:17
@agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not clear why this was conditional logic exists. I wanted to verify this before merge.

agjohnson added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2021
@Blendify Blendify deleted the Blendify/docs-local-theme branch March 12, 2021 20:19
@Blendify Blendify restored the Blendify/docs-local-theme branch March 12, 2021 20:21
@agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

I can't dig up any history on this one. The conditional logic was added and removed a several times. I think the conditional was mostly to preserve master from breaking docs. We're using stable as the default version in the docs, and could consider disabling latest entirely, as we have specific versions building anyways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants