Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New example: Autoscaling multi-tenant Kubernetes Deep dive #154

Conversation

jacobtomlinson
Copy link
Member

Added a new example taking a deep-dive into launching an autoscaling multi-tenant RAPIDS environment on Kubernetes.

Being able to scale out workloads and only pay for the resources you use is a fantastic way to save costs when using RAPIDS. If you have many folks in your organisation who all want to be able to do this you can get added benefits by pooling your resources into an autoscaling Kubernetes cluster.

This notebook runs through the steps required to launch a Kubernetes cluster on GKE, then simulates the workloads of many users sharing the cluster. It then explores what that experience was like both from a user perspective and also from a cost perspective.

image

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@jacobtomlinson
Copy link
Member Author

cc @mmccarty would be great to get your input on this. I expect we can turn this example into more content for the blog too.

Copy link
Contributor

@mmccarty mmccarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Just a few minor things.

jacobtomlinson and others added 2 commits February 24, 2023 10:50
Co-authored-by: Mike McCarty <mmccarty@nvidia.com>
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson merged commit 5704978 into rapidsai:main Feb 24, 2023
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson deleted the autoscaling-multi-tenant-kubernetes branch February 24, 2023 17:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants